- Joined
- Dec 16, 2003
- Messages
- 33,896
- Reaction score
- 1,853
- Location
- Edmonton
- Website
- www.mikehodson.ca
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
I've always favoured single point selection. Mostly, I don't like the idea of the camera choosing where it will focus therefore I like to pick one point and make the camera focus on exactly what I want it to.
I mostly shoot with a 5D mkII, which certainly isn't known for it's AF prowess....I've found that it's really no better than my old 20D cameras (which was disappointing because the 5DII is a lot newer and more expensive).
Anyway, I was shooting a hockey tournament recently and at times I was having trouble with the speed of the AF (single AF point, 70-200mm F2.8 L IS). I wasn't surprised really, it's never been fast but I don't usually shoot sports and I found that I was missing focus a lot more than I thought I would.
On the second day, (after really seeing how often the focus was missed), I switched to Auto Point Selection.....and wow, it was a lot faster to focus. Of course, there were still plenty of issues where the camera chose something that I didn't intend to focus on, but releasing and reactivating the AF, to make the camera choose something else, worked most of the time.
Overall, I ended up with many more tack sharp shots with the auto point selection than with single point.
And for the first time, I was actually happy that the 5DII has the same small cluster of AF points from the crop bodies, because it at least gave me control over where it would focus by keeping the subject in the centre of the viewfinder.
I'm also starting to appreciate why cameras with advanced AF are that much faster. For example, on a model with 49 or 51 AF points, you can choose to use a cluster of points and move the cluster around, thus getting the best of both the control of 'single point' and the speed of 'auto point'.
I mostly shoot with a 5D mkII, which certainly isn't known for it's AF prowess....I've found that it's really no better than my old 20D cameras (which was disappointing because the 5DII is a lot newer and more expensive).
Anyway, I was shooting a hockey tournament recently and at times I was having trouble with the speed of the AF (single AF point, 70-200mm F2.8 L IS). I wasn't surprised really, it's never been fast but I don't usually shoot sports and I found that I was missing focus a lot more than I thought I would.
On the second day, (after really seeing how often the focus was missed), I switched to Auto Point Selection.....and wow, it was a lot faster to focus. Of course, there were still plenty of issues where the camera chose something that I didn't intend to focus on, but releasing and reactivating the AF, to make the camera choose something else, worked most of the time.
Overall, I ended up with many more tack sharp shots with the auto point selection than with single point.
And for the first time, I was actually happy that the 5DII has the same small cluster of AF points from the crop bodies, because it at least gave me control over where it would focus by keeping the subject in the centre of the viewfinder.
I'm also starting to appreciate why cameras with advanced AF are that much faster. For example, on a model with 49 or 51 AF points, you can choose to use a cluster of points and move the cluster around, thus getting the best of both the control of 'single point' and the speed of 'auto point'.