Canon 1DX II or Better lens

Discussion in 'Canon Cameras' started by TonyUSA, Nov 18, 2017.

  1. TonyUSA

    TonyUSA No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2015
    Messages:
    327
    Likes Received:
    30
    Location:
    USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Hello,

    Enjoy taking sport photos such as swim meet. Mostly using 5DIII at the moment. Which would you suggest for upgrade to get better photos between 1DX II or get better lens.

    Thank you,


     
  2. benhasajeep

    benhasajeep No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    4,017
    Likes Received:
    494
    The 1DXII! With the exception of a big fast lens, you aready have a couple good fast mid telephoto lenses. The 1DXII will have better ISO and more than a stop and half dynamic range. Faster frame rate as well.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. weepete

    weepete TPF Supporters Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,122
    Likes Received:
    1,276
    Location:
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    which lens are you using currently?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. TonyUSA

    TonyUSA No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2015
    Messages:
    327
    Likes Received:
    30
    Location:
    USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Thank you for your reply. Sorry for late reply.

    Mostly Canon 70-200mm mkII f/2.8L IS and Canon 100-400mm mkII f/4.5-5.6L. Some time Canon 8-15mm f/4L fisheye, Canon 16-35mm f/4L
     
  5. jaomul

    jaomul Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    5,409
    Likes Received:
    1,414
    Location:
    Cork Ireland
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    You have nice lenses. The next question would be what you hope to achieve with an upgrade, I'd it better quality images or better autofocus or do you need a rugged body, or just a new toy (we all love toys)

    If it's better image quality I'd save money and just go with a 5d 4 which also improves on frame rate over the mark 3. It has better dynamic range, more resolution, slightly less noise and a load of video options missing from the one you have.

    If you need the FPS of the 1dx then that's your only option.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. weepete

    weepete TPF Supporters Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,122
    Likes Received:
    1,276
    Location:
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Yeah, I'd suggest the 5Dmkiv as well. Your current glass is pretty good indeed!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. TCampbell

    TCampbell Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    3,305
    Likes Received:
    1,417
    Location:
    Dearborn, MI
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    You already own several best-in-class lenses.

    The EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM II is currently the best 70-200 lens there is -- from anyone.
    The EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM II is the best in it's class and it's so good that if you slap Canon's 1.4x III teleconverter on it it's still better than any 150-600mm lens in the industry.

    So that's some pretty good glass you have ... and I don't see you being able to upgrade the lenses much (unless you're going after Canon's really big white whale lenses). So if you're using your 100-400 and it's getting you the framing you want... but you're not happy about shooting at f/5.6, then maybe a 300mm or 400mm f/2.8 could come in handy. But be warned... they are heavy lenses. When the lens gets that long, in order to maintain a low focal ratio it needs a wide aperture and that means each glass element inside the lens is very large ... and that means heavy.

    I use a 5D IV and I still have my 5D III. I do not have a 1DX II -- nor have I ever shot with one. So I can't comment on the 1DX II other than to say that it's burst rate is amazing.

    The 5D IV got a bit of an upgrade in ISO... a bigger upgrade in dynamic range... and a bit of an upgrade on the already very good auto-focus system that the 5D III has. It also picked up features such as touch-screen LCD and built-in WiFi & GPS (not features that impact your photo quality -- just nice to have stuff.)

    As I recall the 5D IV picked up about 1 frame per sec. in it's burst speed... but it's nothing compared to a 1D X II. The 1D X II can do 14 fps in normal mode and 16 fps in live-view mode and it has an internal memory buffer so large than it can take 170 RAW images before you have to wait for it has to slow down. In fairness these are 20 Mp images (vs. the 5D IV's 30Mp images size).
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. TonyUSA

    TonyUSA No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2015
    Messages:
    327
    Likes Received:
    30
    Location:
    USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Thank you everyone for your valued input.
     
  9. TheDanishDanger

    TheDanishDanger No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2015
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    205
    Location:
    St. Michaels, Maryland
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I can’t stress enough the difference of high quality glass. When I made the switch from a 300mm f4 IS USM (which is a great lens) to the 500mm f4 IS USM the difference was incredible. Glass wins for me.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. TonyUSA

    TonyUSA No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2015
    Messages:
    327
    Likes Received:
    30
    Location:
    USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit


    Let talk about lens only. Not to pick between new camera or new lens.

    Do you or anyone here think it would be HUGE improvement from my 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 to 500m IS? I had an eye on 300mm f/2.8 IS II before.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

news