Canon 28-105 vs. Canon 28-135

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by lathamemmons, Sep 19, 2006.

  1. lathamemmons
    Offline

    lathamemmons New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    french lick IN
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    i need help deciding witch lens to get for my elan 7ne
    Canon EF 28-105/3.5-4.5 USM or the Canon EF 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS USM

    anyone who has one of these, info on sharpness and focus speed and quality
    would be greatly appreciated


    thank you very much
    latham james
  2. darin3200
    Offline

    darin3200 New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,078
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Des Moines, Iowa
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +28 / 0
    I've used both and I prefer the 28-135. The image stabilization is nice in darker places, the lens is bigger and has a better build quality. The 28-105 feels cheaper and small.
  3. lathamemmons
    Offline

    lathamemmons New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    french lick IN
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    thanks man
    so is the 28-135 a pretty good lens out of all or just compared to the 28-105
  4. darin3200
    Offline

    darin3200 New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,078
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Des Moines, Iowa
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +28 / 0
  5. lathamemmons
    Offline

    lathamemmons New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    french lick IN
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    im more of a outdoors waterfall backwoods kindof photographer
    hmm the 3.5 dosent bother me very much my other lens are slower than that

    and im wanting to get a better lens because the 28-90 is horribly loud and slow.
  6. darin3200
    Offline

    darin3200 New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,078
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Des Moines, Iowa
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +28 / 0
    Ok that works then. For outdoor stuff 3.5 should be plenty.
  7. Iron Flatline
    Offline

    Iron Flatline Guest

    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    It's a good lens. It was my daily work horse for 4 years, and then started feeling tired in terms of its action. But the focus remained quick enough, and the sharpness was good enough for me.

    Of course, Canon makes a 24-105 1:2.8 L lens that costs a LOT more, but is unBELIEVABLY!! good.

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
canon 28-105 canon 28-135
,

28-105 vs 28-135

,

28-135 vs 28-105

,
canon 24 105 vs 28 135
,
canon 24 105 vs canon 28 135 lens
,
canon 24-105 vs 28-105
,

canon 24-105 vs 28-135

,
canon 24-85 vs 28-105 vs 28-135
,
canon 28 105 vs 28 135
,
canon 28 135 vs 24 105
,
canon 28-105 vs
,

canon 28-105 vs 24-105

,

canon 28-105 vs 28-135

,
canon 28-105 vs. canon 28-135
,
canon 28-135 or 24-105
,

canon 28-135 vs 24-105

,

canon 28-135 vs 28-105

,
canon ef 28-105 vs 28-135
,
canon ef 28-135 vs 28-105
,
canon lens 24-105 vs 28-135