asfixiate
TPF Noob!
Only thing really that makes the most sense if the 220 is better is the height of the flash. In theory if its higher than the popup flash you'd less likely have any "interference"(not sure if I should have used noise)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In photography there's some things money can buy, for everything else, there's The Strobist Blog.
Brought to you by the cult members of The Strobist Blog.
According to the specs. The Flash on the XT has a GN of 42' (13M). The 220EX has a GN of 72' (22M). So the 220EX is certainly more powerful.
I believe it is higher than the built-in flash (which helps to avoid red-eye) but not by a whole lot.
To me, the bottom line is that it doesn't tilt or swivel, so it's not worth it.
This lens is freaking me out. I was in my bedroom with all the lights out except for the tv which wasn't very bright. I took a shot of my dog and fiance w/o flash and it came out looking like it had a flash. I think this lens is amazing. I'm not sure whether I know what I'm doing or the lens is just that good but a lot of the photos I'm taking look almost like photo shoot quality.
Would you say within 20 feet this is pretty universal for taking shots of People?