canon 50mm f/1.4 Vs. f/1.8

Discussion in 'Photography Beginners' Forum' started by dustinpedley, Mar 3, 2009.

  1. dustinpedley

    dustinpedley TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Missoula MT
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    is the f/1.4 worth the extra $$$ $375 Vs. $80

    Ive seen good reviews on both, plus the f/1.8 is $80

    Does anyone have some or know where i can see some side by side photos taken with both to compare the lenses?

    Thanks
    -Dustin
     
  2. LarryD

    LarryD TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    614
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Mojave Desert
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    When you go for a 1.4, or even a 1.2 over a 1.8, you are not always looking for a "better" image quality for your money, you are looking for the faster speed and higher light gathering capability, which is where the money is.... (on high end products)

    That, and the status...:D
     
  3. Dao

    Dao No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Messages:
    6,252
    Likes Received:
    418
    Location:
    St. Louis
    It is really a personal preference.

    From what I read ...

    1.4 is sharper, faster, better build, more aperture blades (more creamy blur look), has Dof scale, faster autofocus .... but will it worth the extra money. Some will say yes and some with say no.


    For regular photos taken with both lenses, you may not see much different. However, you can see the different if the photo are taken with the lenses and have a blur background. The f/1.8 version is not as creamy as the f/1.4 (because it only have 5 aperture blades)
     
  4. bdavis

    bdavis TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    784
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Iowa
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I would say no, the 1.8s perform just as well in my opinion, save the money and get another lens with it.
     
  5. Big Mike

    Big Mike I am Big, I am Mike Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    33,822
    Likes Received:
    1,811
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    This was probably the most asked question on many photography forums before digital took over and 'What camera should I get?' become more popular.

    The others have made good points so far.

    To me, the biggest difference is the overall quality of the lens. The F1.8 version is made to be cheap and light. Plenty of plastic was used and the AF motor is very basic. The glass is quite good though...which makes this lens a great value.

    The F1.4 version is a higher level lens. The construction is better and it has better AF. It simply feels better when you are using it. And overall, at only $375, it is actually a pretty good value itself. If you plan to use the lens in a professional manor or even if you plan to keep it for many years...this would be my recommendation.

    There is an F1.2 L version as well....which is much, much more expensive.
     
  6. Samanax

    Samanax TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,562
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kaneohe, Oahu
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I agree with Big Mike. You might not be able to tell the difference between pictures taken by both lenses, but I think you would notice a big difference in the shooting experience. I have the f/1.8 and it tends to hunt for focus in low light, is a little slow to focus and just sounds cheap...and the plastic lens mount just adds to the cheap feel of the lens. I plan to replace it with the f/1.4 after I get the EF 85mm f/1.8 USM lens.
     
  7. dustinpedley

    dustinpedley TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Missoula MT
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I have heard some bad things about the USM motor on the 1.4's

    any thoughts?
     
  8. RyanLilly

    RyanLilly No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,478
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    St. Louis, Missouri, USofA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I have both the 1.8 and the 1.4. I would say that I very much like the 1.4 better. It's really better than the 1.8 in every way, especially when it comes to focusing in low light. Also Full time manual is a good feature, It allows you tweak focus in auto, without switching to manual. It comes in handy when shooting with very shallow dof.
     
  9. Samanax

    Samanax TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,562
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kaneohe, Oahu
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    You read the reviews over at Amazon?

    All 12 of my Canon shooting buddies have the EF 50mm f/1.4 USM and no one has complained about the motor or the general performance of the lens. Last problem I heard of from any of them was the mirror falling off a Canon 5D because of the glue issue. But that was taken care of quickly by Canon Hawaii.
     
  10. usayit

    usayit No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2003
    Messages:
    9,523
    Likes Received:
    344
    Location:
    North New Jersey, United States of America
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    stick to your budget. The 50mm f/1.8 is a very affordable and very good quality lens. The initial investment is so small and it is a relatively easy lens to sell used that there is no reason why you shouldn't use it as a starting point. At some point in time, you will either be satisfied with the results or decide to move on. If you stick to the 50mm f/1.8, then you just saved yourself some $$$. If you decide to move on, you had little $$ invested and the experience to appreciate the f/1.4. Either way, you are a winner.

    The 50mm f/1.4 buys you a better build, USM motor, and more aperture blades.

    It is also important to note that a faster aperture buys you f-stops but not necessarily image quality. The wider the aperture the more complex the issues involved with optical design. There are many examples in which the "slower" lens can out perform the "faster" lenses in IQ (and weight). One example, was the Canon 50mm f/1. The 50mm f/1.4 (and f/1.8) out performed that lens in every way except the extra f-stops of light. The 50mm f/1 was several times the cost of either.
     
  11. RyanLilly

    RyanLilly No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,478
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    St. Louis, Missouri, USofA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    usayit has hit the nail square on the head.
     
  12. usayit

    usayit No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2003
    Messages:
    9,523
    Likes Received:
    344
    Location:
    North New Jersey, United States of America
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I used to deal in equipment.. There have been lemons in every product line but I have never heard any significant trends of USM motor failures in the 50mm f/1.4. I have heard of failures in the plastic mount of the 50mm f/1.8 mark II version. In most cases, the photographer was working his equipment hard enough that it justified going to the better build 50mm f/1.8 Mark I or the 50mm f/1.4.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

beach carmel photos

,

canon 50 mm 1.8 vs 1.4 for beginner

,

canon 50mm 1.4 vs 1.8

,

canon 50mm 1.4 vs canon 50mm 1.8

,

canon 50mm f 1.4 vs f 1.8

,

canon 50mm f/1.4 vs f 1.8

,

canon 50mm f/1.4 vs. f/1.8

,

f 1.4 vs f 1.8 canon

,

side by side shots canon 50mm 1.4 1.8