Canon 50mm primes

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by Payt, Dec 12, 2007.

  1. Payt

    Payt TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2007
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    So, I have decided to invest in one of these.

    Canon 50mm f/1.8
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/12142-USA/Canon_2514A002_Normal_EF_50mm_f_1_8.html

    Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=cart&A=details&Q=&sku=12140&is=USA

    See, my original plan was to go with the 1.8 after it caught my eye; it's a real cheap lens with good ratings, and something that I'd get a load of use out of. But now I have discovered the 1.4, which costs almost 300 bucks and has USM.

    Now... who can tell me how big of a difference there is between the two? Obviously there is a price difference, but is that simply due to the USM and extra .4 to min aperture? Is there a noticeable difference in quality? Or would I get a bigger bang for my buck if I bought the 1.8 for only $75? And how is the autofocus on the 1.8?

    Your thoughts on this matter are appreciated.
     
  2. usayit

    usayit No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2003
    Messages:
    9,523
    Likes Received:
    344
    Location:
    North New Jersey, United States of America
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    The f1.4 version has
    * more aperture blades = smoother bokeh
    * USM motor versus the noisier slower micro motor
    * much better build

    Both are excellent lenses.. I usually say ....

    got the extra money to burn.. go ahead with the f1.4
    on a budget... go ahead with the f1.8
     
  3. jstuedle

    jstuedle No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    Messages:
    4,889
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    S.E. Indiana
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I would think the Canon version is like Nikon's, substantially better build quality. The extra 1/3 stop of light might be the difference between getting the shot or not. Also the shallower DOF can help isolate the subject a little easier, but that would be a very small difference.
     
  4. Big Mike

    Big Mike I am Big, I am Mike Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    33,822
    Likes Received:
    1,811
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I think 'invest' is the key word here. The 50mm F1.4 is more of an investment because it's made to last longer and/or stand up to more use. The F1.8, is a good lens but it's made to be cheap and light.

    Of course, you could consider the 50mm F1.2 L. It's well over 10 times as expensive as the F1.8 :D
     
  5. Digital Matt

    Digital Matt alter ego: Analog Matt

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    65
    Location:
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
  6. PatriK-b

    PatriK-b TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Absolutely. For me, it's a way to always have a good prime in my bag. Because it's light and cheap, I carry the 50-1.8II with me in all situations.
     
  7. Big Mike

    Big Mike I am Big, I am Mike Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    33,822
    Likes Received:
    1,811
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I agree, it's so affordable that every EOS owner should have one....but if you have a better lens, then it just won't get used.

    I have the older 50mm F1.8 I (metal mount)...and I haven't used it at all, in the last year or more, especially since getting my Sigma 30mm F1.4
     
  8. Alex_B

    Alex_B No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    14,491
    Likes Received:
    206
    Location:
    Europe 67.51°N
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I am pretty happy with my 50mm f/1.4 .. never tried the 1.8 though, so I cannot compare. but people seem to like it as well.
     
  9. the 1.4 is the default lens on my 5D.
     
  10. Hubertus Bigend

    Hubertus Bigend TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Antwerp
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    The f/1.8 is perfectly fine, though the f/1.4 is a lot more "solid".
     
  11. salexander867

    salexander867 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I struggled with the same decision for a couple of weeks. The low price on the 1.8 was almost too much to pass up, but my 1.4 just arrived today. :mrgreen:

    Unfortunately, I have too much work to do to take many shots tonight, but I cannot wait to get some indoor portraits going with this lens.
     
  12. Sideburns

    Sideburns TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    Messages:
    2,796
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I have the 1.8, and it's amazing. But if I had the cash, and didn't have the 1.8, I'd get the 1.4 in a second. 1.4 compared to 1.8 is a lot of light. It's actually TWO THIRDS of a stop...so...

    It's not a bad choice to get either lens..but if you have the cash, the 1.4 is a great little performer.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

50 mm 1.8 canon rochester ny

,

canon 50mm 1.4 rochester, ny