1. (you can dismiss this notice by clicking the X in the upper right hand corner)

    As part of our new initiative on TPF you can come and take part in a series of new in-depth articles and discussions every month. Featured this month are the methods that one of our top avian photographers, Kristofer Rowe uses to get his stunning photos (as also featured on Tamron USA website as well!). So drop in and take part, I know that Kristofer will be happy to answer your questions and hear what you do out in the field with your camera!

    Capturing Distinctive Bird Images

Canon 70-200 L IS Versus 100-400L IS

Discussion in 'Canon Lenses' started by Mike K, Feb 28, 2012.

  1. Mike K

    Mike K TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I'd love to have both of these and may someday. For now, with the understanding that the 70-200 is sharper than the 100-400, has anyone tried both and have impressions to share? I was originally going to get the shorter lens but am now tempted by the longer lens as an interim solution to having both.
     
  2. Big Mike

    Big Mike I am Big, I am Mike Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    33,615
    Likes Received:
    1,754
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I can't remember where...but I read a review that showed the 100-400mm as being sharper than any of the 70-200mm options. But on the other hand, I've always heard that the 70-200mm F4 IS, was one of the sharpest zooms in the line-up.

    The big difference between these two (besides the obvious focal length) is size & weight. The 100-400mm is twice the size and probably three times the weight of the 70-200mm F4.
    So how you intend to use the lens, should probably play a factor in which one to get. The 100-400mm is great for wildlife, but it would be a huge pain to lug that thing around when all you want is a leisurely hike. Or if you're going on a serious hike, you may not want to pack that extra size & weight.

    *edit*
    I had it in my mind that you specifically mentioned the F4 IS version.
    As mentioned, there are 4 different versions of the 70-200mm (5 if you count both the new and old versions of the 2.8 L IS).
     
    Last edited: Feb 29, 2012
  3. Dao

    Dao No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Messages:
    5,971
    Likes Received:
    351
    Location:
    St. Louis
  4. Overread

    Overread has a hat around here somewhere Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    21,522
    Likes Received:
    3,248
    Location:
    UK - England
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Which specific 70-200mm are you referring to? Canon has 5 on the market.

    Personally the only 70-200mm that I'd consider as suitable comparison is the 70-200mm f2.8 IS L MII. That lens (the newest and also most expensive) has improved optics over the original and is an outstanding lens for its 70-200mm range. Furthermore it will take a 2*TC and deliver image quality on par with a good copy of the 100-400mm L (with both also showing marked improvement in optical quality after f7.1/8).
    The other 70-200mm f2.8 lenses will mount a 2*TC, but are not as good - I owned the previous version of the lens and the 2*TC was something I used only once = whereas the MII I'm willing and able to use it all the time without any worries.

    On the other hand the 70-200mm f2.8 MII is heaver than the 100-400mm and more expensive and also has slightly slower AF (when using the 2*TC). If its pure reach you want the 100-400mm would be a good option to consider - also you've the good quality 300mm f4 IS L (+1.4TC) and the 400mm f5.6 L. The 70-200mm f2.8 IS L MII is suitable only if you also want a sharp, fast focusing and excellent 70-200mm lens in its own right.
     
  5. Mike K

    Mike K TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Thanks. I see a comparison a 400mm with a teleconverter on the Canon 70-200. This is the one I saw LensRentals.com - Rent a Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS

    In any case, the 100-400 looks like a contender.

    I was talking about the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS lens.
     
  6. Mike K

    Mike K TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I meant the 2.8 with IS.

    Of course, I want all the best available sharpness, features, and reach though I imagine 80% or more of my use in the 100-200mm range.

    It may be worth noting that I'm using a 60D cropped sensor now and will hopefully go FF but not at least for a year, maybe longer.
     
    Last edited: Feb 29, 2012
  7. Overread

    Overread has a hat around here somewhere Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    21,522
    Likes Received:
    3,248
    Location:
    UK - England
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Hmm the currently available is the MII $2200 lens - the Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L MII. The original version of that lens is now out of production and only sold second hand (far as I know there is no new stock left of it - if there is chances are its selling at an outrageously high price now)
     
  8. Mike K

    Mike K TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Sorry, I didn't edit in time. I got confused and was thinking of the 24-70 version I and II. Just bought a version I on Ebay. Wish me luck.;)

    I meant the 2.8 70-200 with IS.

    Of course, I want all the best available sharpness, features, and reach though I imagine 80% or more of my use in the 100-200mm range.

    It may be worth noting that I'm using a 60D cropped sensor now and will hopefully go FF but not at least for a year, maybe longer.
     
    Last edited: Feb 29, 2012

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
70-200 vs 100-400
,
100-400 canon
,
canon 70 200 f4 vs 100 400 is
,

canon 70 200 is 100 400 is sharper

,
canon 70-200 f4 vs 100-400 f4.5-5.6
,
canon 70-200 versus 100-400
,
canon 70-200 vs 100-400 sharpness
,
canon 70-200 vs canon 100-400 comparison
,
difference between canon 70-200 vs 100-400
,
old 2003 canon 100-400 is lens vs 2013