catchlights:

Discussion in 'Photography Beginners' Forum' started by magicmonkey, Sep 23, 2006.

  1. magicmonkey

    magicmonkey TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    579
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, UK
    ok, so how do you get a catchlight in someones eyes? The reflection of one of course! Do you need to blind them with a torch?
     
  2. tempra

    tempra TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,669
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Oxford, UK
    basically make sure that there is a light source reflecting from them, could be a flash, a window or the sun - you could use a torch, but they might hit you with it after a while!
     
  3. W.Smith

    W.Smith TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    440
    Likes Received:
    0
    What tempra says, of course. But you can also paint 'm in later, in PP.
    http://www.pl32.com/, for instance, has a nice spraygun for that.
     
  4. markc

    markc TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,237
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Rochester, NY Velocity: Unknown
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Personally I would avoid adding them with software. While it can give you nice catchlights, they won't match the light. People who have been into photography for a while will see the disjuction and will find it jarring. That's one of the same reasons why I usually don't like replacing a boring sky with a dramatic one. The lighting often doesn't match.

    The eyes are acting like a convex mirror, so any light that is in front of the subject and not too far off to the side will show up in their eyes. They are often handy to use if you are trying to figure out how a photographer lit the scene.
     
  5. W.Smith

    W.Smith TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    440
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're absolutely right, mark. I should have been more specific:
    I'm not advocating creating catchlights – in eyes – where there aren't any*. That'd be weird indeed. But I am advocating 'amplifying' catchlights (if required/neccessary) in PP. I find that many photos that at first glance don't seem to have catchlights, in actual fact do have them if you look closely. Those can be 'amplified' in PP.

    Example:
    [​IMG]

    *in inanimate objects, like gem stones, etc., this is different, of course. But then we're not talking about 'catchlights', but rather about 'specular highlights'.

    Example:
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page