Christmas Light Portraits (Sigma 135 1.8 test)

Discussion in 'People Photography' started by Destin, Dec 10, 2017.

  1. Destin

    Destin Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    782
    Location:
    Western New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Wanted to put my new Sigma 135 1.8 ART to the test at the job I bought it for; portraiture. I recruited a friend of mine to play with Christmas lights and pose for me and got the following photos.

    All photos shot with D810 and 135 1.8 ART. All photos were shot wide open with shutter speeds from 1/100th to 160th and iso from 1600-5600. I continue to be extremely impressed with the sharpness and rendering of this lens. I think it's really going to help my work stand out from the crowd around me and it's going to pay for itself many times over. This is hands down my favorite lens I've ever owned.

    There is some minor retouching and color correction done to these photos, but ZERO sharpening or skin smoothing has been performed whatsoever.

    @Derrel I mentioned I'd show you this post, so here you go! Curious to hear what you think. If you want a RAW file or two to play with I'd be glad to email you some over so you can get a look at them more closely.

    1.)
    [​IMG]

    2.)
    [​IMG]

    3.)
    [​IMG]

    4.)
    [​IMG]

    5.)
    [​IMG]

    6.)
    [​IMG]


     
    • Like Like x 3
  2. jaomul

    jaomul Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    5,472
    Likes Received:
    1,448
    Location:
    Cork Ireland
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Very nice and your friend is very natural in front of the camera
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Destin

    Destin Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    782
    Location:
    Western New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Thanks! And yeah she really is; im definitely going to have to rope her into shooting with me again soon!
     
  4. Granddad

    Granddad Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,913
    Likes Received:
    961
    Location:
    Lincoln, England
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I like them, as Jaomul said above, your friend looks like she has great model potential. Be nice to her!
    #1 is the best IMHO, her eyes, the glow on her face and the background lights are great.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Destin

    Destin Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    782
    Location:
    Western New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Agreed. But number 5 is a close second for me just for the raw simplicity of it.

    And thank you; I’m definitely gonna try to get her back in front of the camera.
     
  6. Derrel

    Derrel Mr. Rain Cloud

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    40,232
    Likes Received:
    15,105
    Location:
    USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Hey, cool, thanks for posting this tonight. I thought it'd be tomorrow, Sunday, before you got anything downloaded and worked up. I'd love a raw file or two to play around with. My favorite shots are #1 and #4. I like the large bokeh balls in shot #1...lovely!

    I've owned multiple 135mm f/2 lenses, going back to the 80's...and several 135/2.8 models and one f/3.5 model, but Sigma's newest f/1.8 pushes the envelope with that f/1.8 maximum aperture and no detectable chromatic aberration. I sold my Ai-S and AF Defocus Control 135's last year, and am now missing having a lens as good as the Canon 132/2-L, which was the thing I liked the very,very most about my Canon system...and the new Sigma looks to me to be as good or better than the Canon lens...
     
  7. vintagesnaps

    vintagesnaps Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,410
    Likes Received:
    1,869
    Location:
    US
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    In the first one with the glow around her and the size of the out of focus in the background the proportion seems off, but I don't know what size the lights actually are.

    I'd think about where you're placing her in relation to the lights and how you're using space. I particularly like the third one. In the last one the lights almost seem tangled in her hair; even if that was the intended effect I'd think about how the hair is arranged and where the lights would look best around her shoulders (notice that one light sticking up into her chin, that might have been better arranged differently).
     
  8. Destin

    Destin Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    782
    Location:
    Western New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    In the first one the bokeh balls are larger because she’s 20-30 feet farther away from the lights.

    And you’re absolutely right about the last one, but it was 28 degrees and we’d been outside for an hour.. neither of us were thinking super clearly at that point lol
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. smoke665

    smoke665 TPF Supporters Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2016
    Messages:
    5,131
    Likes Received:
    2,163
    Location:
    Alabama
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Number 4 & 5 are my favorites, mainly because of how sharp and clear the eyes are. Fantastic!!! Only negative comment, it seems that they might benefit from a tad adjustment to WB. I'm detecting just a slight green tint, but that might be from the surrounding background also.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Gary A.

    Gary A. Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2014
    Messages:
    19,028
    Likes Received:
    6,123
    Location:
    Southern California
    I like these, especially #1, #2 and #4.

    The white balance seems a tad off in these. Not bad, but enough where there is room for improvement, IMO. In #1, I'd center her (crop a bit off the left), and whiten up her eyes and teeth. #2 and #4, I think maybe a bit of overall darkening would help a bit. I am torn between #1 and #2 as my fave.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Donde

    Donde Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,422
    Likes Received:
    1,225
    Location:
    Cali, Colombia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I do prefer the ones with the eyes open. By her dress these must have been outdoors. Looks like a nice lens.
     
  12. DanOstergren

    DanOstergren Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    Messages:
    2,948
    Likes Received:
    2,434
    Location:
    Portland OR
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit


    It's quite sharp for shooting wide open. I'd love to see how it could be improved with a little bit of post sharpening though.

    135mm is a fun portrait focal length, but I never liked the working distance it required, and much prefer the versatility of an 85mm or 100mm in comparison, both of which offer a very similar look, with the Canon 85mm f/1.8 being available at a much lower price. The difference between 85mm and 135mm in aesthetic has never been enough to make me miss working with a 135mm lens.
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page