Considering an upgrade instead of a new lens - 100-400mm vs 70-200mm f2.8 IS M2 +TC

Great! Congrats. Nice to know the lens has already been "tested"!

btw.. Just noticed a previous post about a Sigma dealer with not much stock. I've heard from two shops already that Sigma doesn't treat their retailers very well... one even said "mistreated".
 
Great! Congrats. Nice to know the lens has already been "tested"!

btw.. Just noticed a previous post about a Sigma dealer with not much stock. I've heard from two shops already that Sigma doesn't treat their retailers very well... one even said "mistreated".

I've heard similar stories about canon.
Suffice to say I suspect the larger most companies get the more they lose contact with the base roots of the setup and the more they seek to dictacte their demands. And considering the limited market (you can't really cut out sigma, canon or nikon easily if you are a generalist camera retailer) the large companies know they can get away with things like this - even if nots not something thought of at the top of the company, the lower teirs can get away under the radar often as not
 

Most reactions

Back
Top