This is a HDR-specific question so I am posting it here as opposed to equipment forum.
The D600 AE bracketing shoots 2, 3 frames at 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV, 2/3 EV, 1 EV, 2 EV steps. Compared to the D700 that does 2, 3, 5, 7 frames at 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV, 2/3 EV, 1 EV steps.
For HDR purposes, although I normally go for 5 frames at 1EV steps, there were situations where I went for 7 frames (such as scenes where I am shooting directly into the sun). To me, I love all the features on the D600. It's everything I wanted. Full frame, light weight, excellent video feature etc. However I could not wait any longer and got the D700 more than a year ago. The D700 is a GREAT camera, just a little too heavy for traveling and lacks video feature.
The D600, however, makes me think twice on its AE bracketing feature. I really wish it has the same spec as the D700. Am I asking too much? For HDR photos, do you guys think 2-3 frames is too lacking?
The D600 AE bracketing shoots 2, 3 frames at 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV, 2/3 EV, 1 EV, 2 EV steps. Compared to the D700 that does 2, 3, 5, 7 frames at 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV, 2/3 EV, 1 EV steps.
For HDR purposes, although I normally go for 5 frames at 1EV steps, there were situations where I went for 7 frames (such as scenes where I am shooting directly into the sun). To me, I love all the features on the D600. It's everything I wanted. Full frame, light weight, excellent video feature etc. However I could not wait any longer and got the D700 more than a year ago. The D700 is a GREAT camera, just a little too heavy for traveling and lacks video feature.
The D600, however, makes me think twice on its AE bracketing feature. I really wish it has the same spec as the D700. Am I asking too much? For HDR photos, do you guys think 2-3 frames is too lacking?