so im a fairly new photography, ive only been at it for about a year now. i use a digital camera and it kind of grinds my gears when people say digital photography is not art. i mean yes, it may not cost oodles of money and lets face it 90% of people that think they are "artsy" by using film probably dont develop the negatives and make the prints themselves. so two out of the three steps in producing a photo they probably dont actually touch. appature, shutter speed, iso.. all that stuff must be taken into consideration when taking digital photos. not to mention you still have to have some sense of composition. so for all you wienbags that think your soo fancy.. go analog baby, your sooooo post modern! thats my rant, discuss.