Digital SLR - Nikon D90 or Cannon Rebel

Kind of the point, isn't it? List the pros and cons (hopefully from people that actually use them).
lol ... i've seen some threads turn into "gang wars" cuz of the likes and dislikes of people and at the end the person who started up the thread is even more confused than before.

Yeah, I know what you mean :lol:

Good honest feedback is tough, everyone wants others to pick what they did - at least initially I think... In the end of the day it doesn't matter, so long as the person comes back happy and posts their first photos! :mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
These are basically entry level DSLRs

Sam you are a big help here in the beginner's forum... but I just don't agree with this statement.

I'm not familliar with the Canon, but the D90 is not an entry-level DSLR.
 
I'm not familliar with the Canon, but the D90 is not an entry-level DSLR.
Yeah, sorry...I'm not that familiar with Nikon DSLRs...but what I was trying to get at was those two models are not exactly "professional cameras". To me the term "professional camera" means DSLRs like the Nikon D3X or Canon 1Ds Mk III...but I may just be nit-picking here.
 
i always thought if its a single digit number (in the Camera's name) then its a "professional" camera as Sam has mentioned the examples above.
 
ahem...

...as is customary in threads like this, I must now do the following...

AMIGA RULZ!!!!
 
These are basically entry level DSLRs

Sam you are a big help here in the beginner's forum... but I just don't agree with this statement.

I'm not familliar with the Canon, but the D90 is not an entry-level DSLR.
The D90 is the top of Nikon's entry level group.

It's called entry level, not because of features or IQ (image quality), but because it's all plastic, and has no weather sealing.
 
The D90 is the top of Nikon's entry level group.

It's called entry level, not because of features or IQ (image quality), but because it's all plastic, and has no weather sealing.
Does Canon have an equivalent model?

In fact, how do you pair up Canon models to Nikon models? I can figure out the top pro cameras and the basic entry level models, but with the rest I'm lost.
 
Nikon and Canon models do not pair up really all that well--both makers deliberately try to compete not quite head-to-head. The D90 has pretty good compatibility with older Nikon lenses, and has quite respectable autofocus. The D90 is the top camera out of the five current lower-priced Nikon bodies (the top model out of 6 models if you include the D40x), with video capture, plus 4-level D-Lighting image processing and a 13-mode in-camera image processing effects menu,which includes the ability to process RAW images into JPEG images using the camera itself,after a shooting session is over.

The D90 also has a two-group wireless commander that will command two groups of the better, current Nikon speedlights, plus the SB 800 flash,which was just recently replaced by the SB 900.

All-in-all, the D90 is actually a more sophisticated camera than the Canon 40D, and the D90 and the Nikon system has what is by the acounts of most people who follow such things, a vastly superior flash system. Not too long ago Syl Arena put up an excellent list of 17 things he wishes Canon would do to improve its speedlight system to bring it up to par with Nikon's excellent CLS System; many of his complaints are just for Canon to bring their system up to parity with Nikon's. Read his post here, and see how many areas Canon's speedlights need improvements on PixSylated | Digital Photography, Canon Flash, Shooting Tethered » My Canon Speedlite Wishlist

If you ask me, the Canon D40-D50 are still the same-old-same-old warmed over yet again, with little advance since the preecessor body was premiered in the form of the 10D, with higher MP pixel count sensors every few years, but really quite lacking in features compared with the mid-level Nikons like the D90, and far behind the D200 and D300 models; of course, the D300 costs more than the 40D, but then it's a much,much higher-specified camera than a 50D or 40D; in all honestly, Canon's 10D-20D-30D-40D-50D and EOS5D and 5D Mark II are all built upon,basically,what was a $300 EOS ELAN film body and sub-systems, whereas the Nikon D200 and D300 were/are built upon something much more akin to the $1,000 Nikon F100 film body. My biggest complaint with the 40D is the highly-centrally weighted AF system,and the clunky multi-mode control buttons and the ridiculously small Multi-Controller that Canon uses. Nikon has a much simpler, non-dual-function approach to body controls, making Nikon bodies more-intuitive to use. I know: I own both a Canon 20D and a Canon 5D, as well as three Nikon-based bodies.

The 40D's rear dial and the front dial switch functons back and forth,back and forth,depending on the exposure mode the camera is set to,and the top deck's four buttons each have TWO functions. On a Nikon D90, the rear dial and the front dials always control the same functions, whatever exposure mode the camera is set to. Many people prefer the one control,one function approach of Nikon, as ell as the Nikon concept of ONE dial ALWAYS adjusting the f/stop,the other ALWAYS adjusting the shutter, and not yo-yo'ing the functions depending on the light metering mode you just happen to be in.

The D90 is however, closer in terms of body build and subsystems to the 40D and 50D, than it is to the D200 and D300, which are bodies a noticeable notch above the 40D. Canon really does not quit have a direct competitor to the D90....as I said, the D90 is the top out of FIVE lower-cost Nikon bodies,and might most-appropriately be called Nikon's current "hobbyist" or "consumer" d-slr model.
 
Last edited:
Nikon vs Canon is like Chocolate vs Vanilla Ice Cream. I like Chocolate, and Love the Nikon for personal use. I work with both Nikon and Canon, image quality - BOTH ARE GREAT.
...maybe stop by Bestbuy or any other camera/retail stores and take a look...
do that! and then buy it from B&H, Adorama, FocusCamera and not overpay by 100s of $.
Good Luck
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top