OK boyz-n-girlz, I'm having a dilemma. I was planning to go visit my former country (Romania) with the wife. She's never been to Europe and wants to go. But... The prices are just ferociously high! 5k to 6k for a 2 week stay including hotels but no meals or car rental! Holy smokes!... So, I looked around to spending 2 weeks in: 1 - London 2 - Rome 3 - Maui 4 - Australia 5 - Greece I found packages to the above destinations for less than the trip to Romania. So, if no luck with trimming down the expenses in Romania it looks like we'll be going to one of the above places. I'm asking y'all: What do yout think what the advantages/disadvantages are for each of the 5 destinations and why. From my point of view: 1 - London - never been there and would love to visit; 2 - Rome - been there many times, speak the language (need a refresher course though) and know the attractions well, I can play guide to my wife; 3 - Maui - interesting place but not as interesting as Kaua'i; 4 - Aussie land - Isn't it winter in mid July? But would love to go. 5 - Greece - never been there and would love to visit. Feel free to post any thoughts (in other words make up my fr***ing mind for me!) and vote.