DX/FX Lens Question and whats best for Travel?

Discussion in 'Nikon Lenses' started by greenx, Dec 21, 2012.

  1. greenx
    Offline

    greenx New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2012
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas, USA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0
    Hey all, Im pretty new here. I've been shooting with my D5100 as a starter camera for the past year and been recently thinking upgrading to a full frame until recently got word of an upcoming deployment to A-stan. Instead I have been thinking about holding off on the full frame and maybe picking up a lens or two instead....

    Now are FX lens' compatible with DX APSC bodies?

    Also any suggestions for a good lens for either portraits/low light photography or landscape photography that will endure a pretty rough travel (Im thinking not the most expensive, I would hate to have a lens break over there)...


    Thanks!!
  2. SCraig
    Offline

    SCraig Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,742
    Likes Received:
    2,051
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2,055 / 0
    FX lenses are compatible with DX bodies but not necessarily the other way around. Trying to use a DX lens on an FX body will usually result in serious vignetting of the image. Some of my lenses are FX lenses and work just fine on my DX bodies. I don't even own an FX body and don't really see a need for one.
  3. shadowlands
    Offline

    shadowlands Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    67
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +67 / 0
    Just make sure you get an AF-S lens so it will auto-focus with your camera, if that's important to you.
  4. greenx
    Offline

    greenx New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2012
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas, USA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0
    Thanks alot for the feedback... Just gotta find a lens or two... I'm thinking something versatile like a 18-105mm
  5. Vautrin
    Offline

    Vautrin New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    903
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +55 / 0
    You'll get sharper images, and better quality from prime lenses.

    The problem with this is you'll need to buy several to cover a typical zoom range, and then you'll have to "zoom with your feet"

    May not be good for you, you might prefer a zoom that's all together
  6. SCraig
    Offline

    SCraig Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,742
    Likes Received:
    2,051
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2,055 / 0
    Let's quantify that: You'll get SLIGHTLY sharper images, and SLIGHTLY better quality from prime lenses.

    Years ago there was a significant difference between primes and zooms but present day optics and manufacturing techniques have narrowed the gap. While there is a difference between the two it is nowhere near as noticeable today as it was years ago. In my personal opinion the convenience of a zoom lens far outweighs the difference in image quality of a prime lens, enough so that I don't even own any prime lenses for my DSLR cameras even though I still have some for my old 35mm camera.
    • Like Like x 1
  7. greenx
    Offline

    greenx New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2012
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas, USA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0
    I have looked at a few zooms with nice focal lengths such as a 18-105 or 20-80 Nikkor lenses... Any real thoughts/opinions on particular lenses? I am thinking about a DX because it will save me a little money plus if the afghans steal it I won't be so heart broken but I am still debating... a 10-24 wide would be nice if they weren't 1K+...
  8. Mach0
    Offline

    Mach0 TPF Supporters

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    2,416
    Likes Received:
    374
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    203
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +376 / 0

    Sigma 10-20 or the tokina version.
  9. JDFlood
    Offline

    JDFlood New Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0
    Given your circumstances I would recommend. Taking only one lens, the 18 - 200mm. Covers everything, no dust in the body, very sharp lens for its kind. No muss, things to loose. I have one, smaller and lighter than the FX.
  10. greenx
    Offline

    greenx New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2012
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas, USA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0
    Thanks guys, much appreciated for everyone's input!!
  11. molested_cow
    Offline

    molested_cow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Messages:
    3,554
    Likes Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Here N There
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +421 / 0
    Tokina F2.8 11-18mm + Nikkor AF-S 18-200mm VR
  12. greenx
    Offline

    greenx New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2012
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Texas, USA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0
    Ended up giving up the d5100 for a Sony a77 with a Tamron 18-270... Nervous about switching from Nikon but I really wanted to go with a weather resistant body for my travels and a good all around lens. So far it hasnt dissappointed :)

Share This Page