RebelTasha
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2006
- Messages
- 383
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Canada
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
I ran my first roll of film through an Elan ll.
I'm not expecting great things because I know i'm not using the greatest film but this wasn't even good..
So the film was Kodak UltraMax 400, I set the camera ISO to 400.
The indoor colour pictures were basically unusable the grain had almost eaten right through the pictures..so I changed them into b/w and then of course to me they looked fabulous I love grainy b/w..
*Would the noise be more noticable indoors than out? Or was I doing something wrong.. The outdoor ones weren't as bad.
*I noticed I really could get away with some pretty fast shutter speeds indoors low light.. so if I set the in camera to 200 would that make less noise on the pictures??
I am going to change to 200 I think or a different brand or something but I still have 5 rolls of this Kodak stuff to get through..
I scanned these myself I have scanned 1000's of negatives and not had results like these before (epson 4490)
Really bad
Really bad
Not as bad
Outdoors not as noticable
Here's after I switched them to b/w.
http://public.fotki.com/CanonGirl/canon-elan-ll-35mm-/
I'm not expecting great things because I know i'm not using the greatest film but this wasn't even good..
So the film was Kodak UltraMax 400, I set the camera ISO to 400.
The indoor colour pictures were basically unusable the grain had almost eaten right through the pictures..so I changed them into b/w and then of course to me they looked fabulous I love grainy b/w..
*Would the noise be more noticable indoors than out? Or was I doing something wrong.. The outdoor ones weren't as bad.
*I noticed I really could get away with some pretty fast shutter speeds indoors low light.. so if I set the in camera to 200 would that make less noise on the pictures??
I am going to change to 200 I think or a different brand or something but I still have 5 rolls of this Kodak stuff to get through..
I scanned these myself I have scanned 1000's of negatives and not had results like these before (epson 4490)
Really bad
Really bad
Not as bad
Outdoors not as noticable
Here's after I switched them to b/w.
http://public.fotki.com/CanonGirl/canon-elan-ll-35mm-/
Last edited: