- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 3,248
- Reaction score
- 3,729
- Location
- Cali, Colombia
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Who'd a thunk it...the etymological term for that phrase is "retronym".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What's film?
That stuff that came along after you were in the business for a few years.What's film?
With the exception the form is fitting to the hands. Just because there is a different "medium" inside and has similar design. Doesn't mean they are copying something from the past if the form factor is the same. Film cameras don't need the SLR type form. Look at the original Brownies, TLR's, 6x6 Hassleblads, Bronicas all use spooled films but different form factors. The basic 35mm design is easy for people to handle.The majority of digital cameras have a shape similar to that of cameras designed to run 35mm film between two spools. Cameras that don't have these spools but adhere to the traditional shape are by definition retro since for reasons of functionality there is no necessity for them to have this form.
I wonder how future alien archaeologists would picture (no pun intended) the users of our d slr cameras? One eye beings with thirty fingers?With the exception the form is fitting to the hands. Just because there is a different "medium" inside and has similar design. Doesn't mean they are copying something from the past if the form factor is the same. Film cameras don't need the SLR type form. Look at the original Brownies, TLR's, 6x6 Hassleblads, Bronicas all use spooled films but different form factors. The basic 35mm design is easy for people to handle.The majority of digital cameras have a shape similar to that of cameras designed to run 35mm film between two spools. Cameras that don't have these spools but adhere to the traditional shape are by definition retro since for reasons of functionality there is no necessity for them to have this form.
I could fill a thesaurus with how much I despise film.What's film?
You hush.
I could fill a thesaurus with how much I despise film.What's film?
You hush.
First and and Foremost...lack of profit margin.
With the exception the form is fitting to the hands. Just because there is a different "medium" inside and has similar design. Doesn't mean they are copying something from the past if the form factor is the same. Film cameras don't need the SLR type form. Look at the original Brownies, TLR's, 6x6 Hassleblads, Bronicas all use spooled films but different form factors. The basic 35mm design is easy for people to handle.The majority of digital cameras have a shape similar to that of cameras designed to run 35mm film between two spools. Cameras that don't have these spools but adhere to the traditional shape are by definition retro since for reasons of functionality there is no necessity for them to have this form.
I could fill a thesaurus with how much I despise film.What's film?
You hush.
First and and Foremost...lack of profit margin.