Film/Print Scanner

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by qweasdzyc, Dec 26, 2004.

  1. qweasdzyc

    qweasdzyc TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York
    I'm looking to get a scanner that can do both prints and negatives in the $100-150 range. Most of the scanners I've read reviews for are good at prints but their negative scanning is sub-par.

    However, the Canon CanoScan 8400F seems like a pretty good deal. (PC Mag review) The 4200F is a bit cheaper and seems to have similar specs, but I couldn't find any full-fledged reviews.

    Has anyone had any experience with either of these models? Or perhaps theres another one in this price range you can recommend?
     
  2. airgunr

    airgunr TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    846
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Delavan, Wisconsin, USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    To get decent scanns of negatives or slides I personally think you'll have to look at a better quality scanner. For prints the one your thinking about will probably be OK although I know nothing about the particular model you are talking about.

    If you are serious about the negatives and slides a couple to look at (although above the price range your talking about) would be the Minolta or Nikon film scanners. They are dedicated film scanners. They don't do prints. I have a Nikon Coolscan and find it an excellent scanner. Sorry I couldn't be more help. Good luck!
     
  3. Mitica100

    Mitica100 Moderator Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    9,746
    Likes Received:
    42
    Location:
    Ahwatukee, AZ
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I have the older model of Canoscan D 1230 UF and it does pictures as well as films from 35mm to 4x6. It's a decent scanner...err... let me put it this way: a good scanner for photos and a decent scanner at best for film. As airgunr said, you'd be better off with a dedicated film scanner, Minoltas and Nikons alike. I know they're $$$$ but a lot of people swear by them. There is another film scanner out there, kinda new, made by Plustek. I think I posted here a link to it. Worth checking it out.


    ::edit---> http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15179&sid=5ad1a8d9e3f0170d2d6f16b9b4fda29d
     
  4. Mumfandc

    Mumfandc TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    New York City, Chelsea
    I use the expensive Nikon Coolscan 5000 at my college, for all my medium format films. But at home I have a cheap Epson 1670 flatbed scanner (I use for my 35mm films) which I got for like $139.

    Now and then I have 35mm scans (slides and negs) that turn out GREAT from the Epson, but high end scanners are usually always better because they have auto-focus capabilities. Might be a problem on a flat-bed scanner, which you are looking into.
     
  5. Karalee

    Karalee hOtLiPs!

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,849
    Likes Received:
    46
    Location:
    Here....there....everywhere
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I have the canoscan 8400F, it works great for both print and neg/slide scanning, the MF scanning takes some figuring out but overall Im pleased, I bought mine for 150 shipped from newegg.com.
     

Share This Page