Filthy Rotten Porn - Warning explicit sexual content

Discussion in 'General Gallery' started by gonzo, Mar 22, 2004.

  1. gonzo

    gonzo have kiwi, will travel...

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,755
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +24 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I had alot of trouble deciding whether I should post this or not, but with the suggestions of our mods I decided to go ahead.

    Do not click on the link below:

    1. If you are offended by the depiction of sexual acts
    2. If its against the laws of your city, state or country or community
    3. If you are MDowdy (just kidding mate, I know you've already seen this ;))



    Please keep in mind that I want a critique of the photos most of all, secondly please state you views whether you think this is pornography or not (please keep it civil and mature)

    cheers!

    If you are not offended by any of the above tenets, See Filthy Rotten Porn

    (btw Chase titled this for me :eek: )
     
  2. MDowdey

    MDowdey Guest

    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    i for one thought the pictures were gritty, well taken, and poignant.


    i find the contrast between the act and the grass around it to be very interesting....great work mark!!



    md
     
  3. graigdavis

    graigdavis New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    In my own little world
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    as soon as the site is working Ill let you know what I think. :?
     
  4. Big Mike

    Big Mike I am Big, I am Mike Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    33,558
    Likes Received:
    1,742
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1,755 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    First, I like the color versions better. The green color gives nature a more of a prominent feel. I think that your photos work with the conflict of nature vs. man/garbage/litter...or nature vs Man's worst...or even Man at his most natural.

    With that in mind, I don't like the third in the series...too close. I'd like to see a wider shot that showed more of the forest. The shot is not made by the object...but by it's being in the forest.

    Is it porn?...well I don't think that your portrayal is pornographic. The object is in of itself pornographic but you are not merely reproducing it with your photos.
     
  5. Digital Matt

    Digital Matt alter ego: Analog Matt

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +65 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Ditto, not working.
     
  6. gonzo

    gonzo have kiwi, will travel...

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,755
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +24 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    :?
    i will try and see whats up with during my lunch break. I didn't want to post them here and i don't have enough space on my site.

    Thanks Mike & MDowdy for your input.
     
  7. terri

    terri Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    23,319
    Likes Received:
    1,480
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    In the mental ward of this forum
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1,493 / 1
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Apparently the site is getting a lot of hits.... :wink: It remains unavailable, Kiwi.
     
  8. gonzo

    gonzo have kiwi, will travel...

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,755
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +24 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
  9. terri

    terri Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    23,319
    Likes Received:
    1,480
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    In the mental ward of this forum
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1,493 / 1
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Oh, definitely prefer the B&W....it adds to the grittiness that I assume is what led you to capture the image in the first place. I dig it; and since it is merely an image of a pornographic image that has been trashed (for whatever reason) it's almost one of those "story" kind of pics (who trashed it? how long has it been lying there in the garbage? I wouldn't call pornographic at all. It's more journalistic in presentation, imo.

    Gee...here I thought you'd been out there with a couple of Lucky Dog's car models, or something! :?
     
  10. graigdavis

    graigdavis New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    In my own little world
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    Interesting idea. Its not porn. I couldnt really tell there was a guy there untill I saw the color pictures.

    I guess the pictures dont really strike any cords with me. I almost wish there was something else beside it that put a contrast to it. I guess Im trying to find the purpose of the picture. Or Im just reading into it too much.

    All together nice work though. :)
     
  11. markc

    markc New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,237
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Rochester, NY Velocity: Unknown
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I like the third one in B&W. There are a lot of different ways to read it, but one of the first things that came to mind was the deterioration of the pron print industry with the spread of the Internet. I'm guessing that none of the magazines are in any financial trouble; I'm sure they all have pay web sites; but I would think that the mags don't sell like they used too.

    I think it would have been even more appropriate if it had been a Playboy, depending on your point of view. From a few shots I've seen recently, it seems like they are a lot more explicit than they used to be, which could be seen as a deterioration into the general crotch-shot that is it's competition. In my mind, Playboy has had a distorted view of what beauty is for a while now, but it seems it's getting more and more about the naughty bits.
     
  12. photogoddess

    photogoddess New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    6,253
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Lala Land
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +34 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I am thinking art, not porn. Interesting how hetero porn was discarded near a nude, male gay beach. :shock:
     
  13. malachite

    malachite Heavily Medicated For Your Protection

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    975
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Not in Arizona anymore
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0
    Well I'm totally offended! Appauled that someone would treat a fine magazine that way and then leave it as trash :p The nerve............

    Seriously though, I dig the B&W versions. Strikes me as abstract because you have 2 different subjects going on at the same time coming together. The images on the mag being one and then the magazine itself in it's environment. One of those images that make you think a lot and come up with different senarios in your head.

    Would be an awsome Theme now that I think of it. Images of images in different places. Tons of ideas are now flooding through my head for a new project. Thanks for the motivation vonnagy.....................
     
  14. gonzo

    gonzo have kiwi, will travel...

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,755
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +24 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Its interestting you should that, I was having a chat with Chase about the pics and we felt the colour pics also made the 'porn' bits stand out more making the shots look more gaudy and trashy. But the green, as you say also make the natural environment stand out more.

    I myself prefer the b&w, but thats just my personal preference. I am a bit partial to the first b&w because the way it blends with the enviroment, especially if you look like upper right hand corner - its a blending of nature and enviroment. I could have tweak the contrast more to get the mag to stand out more but I kinda like the effect.

    Anyways, I really appreciate your comments here. I don't really consider this groundbreaking stuff, but i did think it was interesting subject :D cheers!
     
  15. manda

    manda instigator of pottymouthedness

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    3,330
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    sydney
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +10 / 0
    Yeah my thoughts still stand too matey.
    BW is definitely better...
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
filthy porn pics
,
filthy sex pics
,
rotten .com
,

rotten porn

,
rotten pussy
,
rotten pussy pics
,
rotten.com porn
,
rottenporn
,
rotton .com
,
rotton.com