First Self-Developed Roll (!)

Discussion in 'Film Discussion and Q & A' started by elemental, Jul 29, 2008.

  1. elemental

    elemental TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2008
    Messages:
    646
    Likes Received:
    3
    As many of you know (and thank you for all of your help), I have embarked on the adventure of developing my own black and white film. The chemicals and large order of film arrived yesterday, and so I wasted a roll as quickly as possible in order to get to the developing.

    The negatives themselves seem pretty soft in the blacks. I know they were exposed correctly- would this indicate underdeveloping? I suspect my developer was a little cooler than 75. These are scans of Ritz prints from the negatives (sorry, no film scanner yet and yes, these are the worst scans ever). Please excuse the horrendous blacks.

    Nikon N75, Arista Pro II 400 (Agfa APX 400), Clayton F76+


    Fruit in my living room:
    [​IMG]


    Leaves in the back yard:
    [​IMG]



    More leaves (still prowling the back yard trying to waste film):
    [​IMG]



    If anyone of you sages would like to share some ideas on getting better darks on the negatives so there wouldn't need to be so much correction in printing, feel free to share. I'm going to try some Tri-X in a little bit with more careful monitoring of temperature.
     
  2. compur

    compur No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,722
    Likes Received:
    400
    Location:
    L.A.
    I don't know what you mean by soft in the blacks. "Soft" usually pertains
    to focus. Is that what you mean?

    Temperature is important with 76-type developers. Time needs to be
    adjusted accordingly. How much cooler was it?

    That enters 3 variables: your developing, Ritz's printing and then the scanning.
    It's hard to tell what you are asking and what you want to know.
    Your developing looks pretty good to me but it's not clear to me what you
    don't like about the pics.

    How are they horrendous? How do you want them to look?
     
  3. elemental

    elemental TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2008
    Messages:
    646
    Likes Received:
    3
    I meant the negatives never really get to "black." The darkest areas are dark gray.


    I would say at most 3-5 degrees off, so maybe 72 instead of 75. From 68 to 75 is a two-minute jump (eight minutes down to six).


    This refers to the bars, stripes, and general nastiness i see in the dark areas of the images, particularly the first and second. I think the scan of the print is pretty poor.
     
  4. randerson07

    randerson07 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    279
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Pingree Grove, Illinois
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I think they look pretty good, that second one in particular I like. The light on the leave is very nice.

    We cant tell much at all about the negs from scans of digital prints. The lines look to me like they are from the scans. Do those lines show on the prints? negs?

    You did far better than I did on my first roll. Be on the look out for a film enabled scanner on craigs list, you should be able to get one cheap.
     
  5. ann

    ann No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 14, 2007
    Messages:
    4,263
    Likes Received:
    189
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    black in a negative is clear film, not gray.

    temperature control is critical. close is not good, this is not horseshoes.
     
  6. elemental

    elemental TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2008
    Messages:
    646
    Likes Received:
    3
    Well I have the advantage of having a camera with a working shutter (just kidding- more mojo in your Petri's little finger than in my little Ricoh).

    The lines are not on the negs or the prints, they're from my ghetto scanner that I used to scan the prints. I need me a film scanner- thinking about one of the refurbished Epsons.

    Tri-X is drying one the side of the fireplace. Second roll was much much much easier- so many tricks you pick up so fast. I definitely learn best by doing.
     
  7. KD5NRH

    KD5NRH TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Stephenville TX
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    2 degrees makes a big difference with BW. Color is even pickier. OTOH, scanning your own negs allows a *lot* of latitude in the process - two stops of correction done right can be almost invisible.
     
  8. elemental

    elemental TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2008
    Messages:
    646
    Likes Received:
    3
    Right. So this would mean my lights/highlights. I was referring to the dark areas of the negative. Same thing.

    On my second run, temperature was within half a degree of 68. It's so much easier to get the water to the right temperature before mixing the chemicals- I feel stupid for doing it the other way around the first time.
     
  9. compur

    compur No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,722
    Likes Received:
    400
    Location:
    L.A.
    Considering the Ritz printing and the scanning, and the temperature issue,
    they look pretty good to me.

    My view: To get the most out of B&W photography you have to do
    everything yourself. Especially the printing. There are as many variables
    to printing as there are to shooting and film developing.
     
  10. Helen B

    Helen B TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,296
    Likes Received:
    465
    Location:
    Hell's Kitchen, New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    These look fine, given that they are poor scans of Ritz prints. For conventional printing the dark areas of the negative (ie the highlights) should not be black, they should be see-through. The old rule-of-thumb is that you should just be able to read a newspaper when the negative is placed over it.

    Best,
    Helen
     
  11. manfromh

    manfromh TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    tallinn, estonia
    I quite like the first one (if i look past the scanning problems)
     
  12. nealjpage

    nealjpage multi format master in a film geek package

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,479
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Oregon
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Ah, I remember my first roll of film. Memories....
     

Share This Page