Fuji st or Sony

Discussion in 'Mirrorless Cameras' started by Elkhunter, Sep 10, 2017.

  1. fmw

    fmw No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    3,614
    Likes Received:
    467
    That is also the domain of the photographer, not the equipment.


     
  2. Gary A.

    Gary A. Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2014
    Messages:
    18,407
    Likes Received:
    5,886
    Location:
    Southern California
    This may or may-not, (see how I cleverly covered all bases ...), be what you're seeing/asking about. Sony uses a standard Bayer CFA and Fuji uses a proprietary X-Trans CFA. Depending on your eye, the differences in RAW images can be significant or insignificant. To my eye, X-Trans looks more like film than Bayer, but it is a subtle difference. As most regard Fuji's SOOC JPEGs to be one of the best, in-camera software may also play a role in the difference between X-Trans images and other camera systems images.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. enerlevel

    enerlevel TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    6


    hi have moved from mirrorless to Dslr. use to have Sony a7 and then xt-20 and now Nikon d600.
    I am just a gadget freak and like to change time by time.
    Sony a7 altho a full frame sensor, but doesn't perform very well at high iso. I get plenty of colour banding (purple) at high iso plus the lens are extremely expensive

    xt-20 is a good camera with a modern sensor with less purple noise at high iso. however at lower iso, the a7 will be sharper.

    the best thing about mirrorless is that all the lens will be calibrated and you will get sharp images. Since I have moved to Nikon d600, I am having a lot of problems with different lens calibration...I even sent my camera for a fix and still struggling to get pin sharp images with the setup.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page