I've noticed that even in low ISO (100) that the image quality seems a little off to me from my 20D. I'd like to hear from others whether I'm nuts, or they also think it seems off. I've attached a small part of an image to hopefully illustrate what I mean. This was shot RAW and opened with Adobe bridge at 300DPI. The exposure was pushed up by 0.30, but that's not a controlling factor. Particularly noticeable if you look at the material and the shadow, I don't think it's just the weave of the material I'm seeing. This image is just a crop, not enlarged. Shot at 1/60 f7.1 under strobes. Could I get the thoughts of some others, particularly Canon users.