Hells Gate in Infrared

Discussion in 'Landscape & Cityscape' started by Garbz, Mar 15, 2009.

  1. Garbz

    Garbz No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    203
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I was having a really crap day. It was overcast so I decided to leave my film camera along with it's efke 850 IR film in the car thinking IR was a total waste of time. Well by the time we hiked to hells gate a few hours later we had the most perfect conditions for IR photography.

    The D200 had to do in this case:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    And on the way back we worked our way over the green sludge, not worth starting a new thread for this one:
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Al-Wazeer

    Al-Wazeer TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,174
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bahrain (somewhere in mid east)
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    nice!

    i like IR photography, but never had the chance or the equipments to shoot IR.

    but how did you make the trees looks ghost-y :p?

    and i don't think hell would look that beautiful :p!
     
  3. Garbz

    Garbz No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    203
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    The trees look ghosty because of the digital IR. The IR effect turns them white, and when using a digital camera that hasn't been specifically converted for the effect the photos require a long exposure. 25seconds exposures + wind makes them give the glowing leaves their ghostly blur.

    Oh and if I took a photo straight down from where I am standing you'd know why it's called Hells Gate. It's a small cove surrounded by a 40m cliff.
     
  4. ValDR

    ValDR TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    The first one is great. There is a dreamy atmosphere due to the ghostly trees.
     
  5. LaFoto

    LaFoto Just Corinna in real life Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2004
    Messages:
    34,814
    Likes Received:
    814
    Location:
    Lower Saxony, Germany
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Ahhh, the green of the sludge ... :D :D :D!

    So in how far would it have been better to have that IR film camera on you for this kind of photography???
     
  6. Garbz

    Garbz No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    203
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Well really bad actually, because I developed the IR roll I shot the day after and completely fouled up the development of it :(. Only 1 photo on the 36roll turned out.

    As for how it would have been better, it would have proper accurate contrast and a faster shutter speed. What I mean by that is the sky would have followed the water to be perfectly pitch black, and the IR effect would be stronger, i.e. leaves would be whiter. I have another photo shoot this weekend and I intend to try again. And the shutter speed is a drastic difference. The D200 was set to ISO100 f/5 at 60seconds (-1.6EV), the Efke IR820 film is ISO100 and in the same lighting conditions with the same filter would work at f/8 1/15th (+10EV), which is nearly 12 stops difference.
     

Share This Page