jachym.czech
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
I currently own Canon 350D and I decided to upgrade to a newer model. However, I cannot decide, which camera would best suit my needs. Basically I shoot mostly Macro and own the excellent Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro lens.
I am considering the following:
- the new Canon EOS 500D
- the older model, but from the higher class - Canon EOS 40D
- or maybe the new Canon EOS 50D.
Now obviously, 50D is probably the best, but it is also the most expensive. Since the 40D is an older generation, in terms of price it is basically same as that of the 500D. I researched the differences and basically the 500D has 15Mpx instead of 10 (40D) and other useful features - but still, the 40D is a semi-pro model.
I read that Mpx only matter if you have a good lens and crop images, but I think that I actually do have a good lens that could make use of the extra 5Mpx and for macro, crops are often useful.
Have that said, would it also be better to pay extra and instead of 40D purchase the 50D? I read some comparisons and it is hard to tell if it is worth it, but the few advantages of the new 50D might be useful for macro.
The 500D is cheaper than the 50D, same price as the 40D.
I would like to know what you think and what are your experiences and opinions.
I am considering the following:
- the new Canon EOS 500D
- the older model, but from the higher class - Canon EOS 40D
- or maybe the new Canon EOS 50D.
Now obviously, 50D is probably the best, but it is also the most expensive. Since the 40D is an older generation, in terms of price it is basically same as that of the 500D. I researched the differences and basically the 500D has 15Mpx instead of 10 (40D) and other useful features - but still, the 40D is a semi-pro model.
I read that Mpx only matter if you have a good lens and crop images, but I think that I actually do have a good lens that could make use of the extra 5Mpx and for macro, crops are often useful.
Have that said, would it also be better to pay extra and instead of 40D purchase the 50D? I read some comparisons and it is hard to tell if it is worth it, but the few advantages of the new 50D might be useful for macro.
The 500D is cheaper than the 50D, same price as the 40D.
I would like to know what you think and what are your experiences and opinions.