High ISO comparison: D50 vs D2x

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by Syndac, Jun 6, 2008.

  1. Syndac
    Offline

    Syndac New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I've been recently trying to decide between a used D2x or new D300 and I've read many reviews stating that the D300 handles higher ISOs much better. I've never really used ISO 800+ on my D50 because things start going downhill but I was wondering how the D2x is in comparison to the D50. Since I mainly shoot ISO 200-400 currently, the super high ISO capabilities of the D300 doesn't matter too much to me, but I want to make sure the D2x is at least decent if I were to take that path.
  2. Kenny32
    Offline

    Kenny32 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    168
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Ok so I learned the hard way about leaving the ISO at 800 for a few baseball games...

    I saw Ian Kennedy (Yankees Pitching prospect) pitch in Double-A...It was sunny, and perfect conditions...THe previous night I had been shooting, so I had the ISO up for that...I forgot to bring it down and all of the shots I had were ruined. If you honestly want to see what a daytime photo looks like with 800 ISO, I'll post it for you, but take my word for it...The D50 and high ISO's do NOT go together...And this is obviously because of the 6.1 MP, compared to the 12.3 you would get with the D300.

    I just purchased a D200 and I'm very happy with it at High ISO's...I've been showing some of my night images with the ISO cranked to around 640-800 to a newspaper photo editor and he's saying they are definitely newspaper-quality. So even if you don't want to shell out the $1700 for the D300 or the extra arm and leg for the D2X...A D200 might be a great solution for you.
  3. Sw1tchFX
    Offline

    Sw1tchFX New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,500
    Likes Received:
    477
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +477 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Anything is newspaper quality, ISO 3200 on anything is newspaper quality. Newspaper printing makes everything look like junk.

    ISO 800 isn't THAT bad on the D50. It doesn't ruin shots. I shoot at ISO 1600 whenever I want on my D70 with absolute disregard to how the noise looks. I shoot weddings and i've never heard complaints about noise at ISO 1600 shots because the client is looking at the subject, not noise. Heck, the last one I shot I shot almost the entire thing above ISO 600. The bride and groom loved the images.

    I also doubt that either of you have seen what ISO 1600 film looks like if you're complaining about ISO 800 being noisy. Digital is far and wide cleaner than film at the high ISO's.

    A sharp, albeit noisy image is far better then a clean, but shaky image.

    EDIT:

    Out of curiosity, I went and found ISO 1600 samples from the D70 and D2x on Moose Peterson's site. Exact same subject. Download the RAW files and look for yourself, the D70 is alot cleaner then the D2x.
  4. Syndac
    Offline

    Syndac New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I have no experience of film nor does it have any relevance to my question. The results from ISO 800-1600 is not to my liking on my current D50. Maybe you have lower standards, but that's a completely different topic.

    My question is... how much better is ISO handling on the D2x compared to the D50?
  5. JimmyO
    Offline

    JimmyO New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    NJ
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Definetly tagging along
    Im looking to make this decesion at the end of summer
  6. tirediron
    Online

    tirediron Watch the Birdy! Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    25,602
    Likes Received:
    6,251
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Victoria, BC
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +6,323 / 1
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    All of the reports & reviews as well as personal experience show the D300 to be second only to the D3 in noise and high ISO performance. I recently shot a night transit of the Panama Canal at 3200 (it's really cool to be able to shoot 1/50 sec at night with only "streetlights" for illumination) and the noise was acceptable or better in all of them.

    Unless the D2 has something specific you need that the D300 doesn't (and the only feature I can think of that it has if you buy a D300 & grip is a voice recorder; yeah, I know there's a couple of other things, but nothing IMHO useful) go for the D300.

    I've put 3000+ images on mine in two months and am still trying to find something bad to say about it.
  7. notelliot
    Offline

    notelliot New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    Messages:
    827
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    d2x was never hailed as a low-light body. it is okay. it's strength, though, is the clarity and low noise at lower ISO's.
    you'd see a difference in resolution, mainly, and not much difference in noise.
  8. Garbz
    Offline

    Garbz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,712
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +202 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Gotta defend AJ here. You sound like someone who doesn't at all care about his photo. Let me guess you download the photo and the first thing you do is zoom in to make sure it's sharp. I have news for you. If you have ever printed a photo you'd realise that HighISO noise is only something that bothers people who count pixels, and not photographers who take beautiful images.

    Maybe you should grab a copy of Time Life's greatest photos of the 20th Century. But then maybe you shouldn't because I doubt a single one of those masterpieces would live up to your mathematical standards.

    The film point is quite relevant if you read between the lines. Every digital camera takes a better photo than the shot of Patterson smacking Johansson in the face in 1961. But I challenge you to use your equipment and take a photo nearly as good. Again the photo probably wouldn't meet your standards so I may as well go type to a wall.
  9. Ihaveaquestion
    Offline

    Ihaveaquestion New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Film grain and digital grain are Far different in my opinion.

    I love 3200 film grain and color 1600 film grain but hate seeing digital grain.

    Sure there are amazing photos taken with high film grain. But the grain has a more artistic look for me. Film grain is more un orderly while digital grain is all in a row same size and shape and looks like crap to me.

    Why dont you leave film out of this topic. He didnt even ask that question.
  10. Syndac
    Offline

    Syndac New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    And this has so much to do with my question....

    I really don't care if high ISO doesn't bother you in your dream world, but in reality noise in pictures decreases value and shows lack of professionalism. If I had the choice between a clean image and one with obvious noise, I know which I'd pick.

    Please keep this thread on topic. Your insults don't offend me, it's obvious I care more about my photographs than you do about yours.
  11. Garbz
    Offline

    Garbz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,712
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +202 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Yes you're absolutely right. People were never professional photographers before the D300 D3, 5D or 1Ds MkII came out. If a funky coloured pixel makes you so unprofessional why not invest in some decent noise reduction software? On a standard 8x5 print I can't tell the difference between ISO1600 and ISO100 on my camera, and the D200 is an equally noisy camera to the D50.

    Btw your question was answered at the top. Guess that means we're not allowed to post an opinion in this thread anymore.

    Bye :salute:
  12. Syndac
    Offline

    Syndac New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I don't recall you giving anything remotely close to an answer to my question.

    If it's on topic and in a respectable manner, feel free.

    I'm slowly losing respect for you from both this thread and two others I've come across in the last few days. Apparently your god complex is quite common on this forum. When your willing to give mature advice in regards to the question asked, I'll definitely listen.
  13. Garbz
    Offline

    Garbz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,712
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +202 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Wow a god complex. If only :fangs:.

    That opinion are typically only held by those people who don't read. You even quoted me. No where did I say I answered your question, I just said your question was answered. Twice in fact. Once by notelliot, and another time by Switch. Or are RAW files not good enough for your comparison?

    I won't be replying here again. For someone with a question you don't really like hearing answers.
  14. Syndac
    Offline

    Syndac New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    The whole point in a forum is to have discussions/feedback as a community. You think that because one or two people gave advice that I no longer care to receive any more opinions? At least one person gave relevant information, unlike what your pointless thread trashing has done. Thanks again.
  15. Mike_E
    Offline

    Mike_E Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    5,248
    Likes Received:
    245
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    The Upper West Side of Mississippi (you have no i
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +248 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Was Batman the one with the cape or was that Robin?
  16. Ihaveaquestion
    Offline

    Ihaveaquestion New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Rent a D2x and see what you think. I'd also check out the D300.
  17. Syndac
    Offline

    Syndac New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Unfortunately there's no place local that I can find and most rental sites are US based. I've held a D2x briefly while buying a lens and it felt great, but I've been seeing mixed results in regards to ISO noise 800 and up when compared to lower models. I understand the D300 is supposed to be amazing in that area which is why I'm stuck between the two.
  18. JimmyO
    Offline

    JimmyO New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    NJ
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    From what i read the d300 is much better then the d2x as far as IQ and noise, but there are benefits that the pro body has but i dont know if you need that or not.

Share This Page