Discussion in 'Feedback and Suggestions' started by JonMikal, Jan 23, 2006.
...since it's become so popular :greenpbl:
but then we'd have to get general b&w, landscape and nature b&w, portrait b&w...
heh, tech fans can say what they want, but see, it's all back to the b&w roots :hippie:
...b&w crit gallery too.
yep, sounds good! work it up Hertz! :lmao: i'll moderate it :greenpbl:
Get to 10K, already.
ok, i'm there, now where's the b&w gallery :mrgreen:
ok then, how about a separate forum for b&w and IR stuff. :lmao:
just smack me and i'll go away
I don't think this is gonna work, but.....
hmmmmm, guess not
i waiting for my gallery or a major whipping. come on, give it to me!!!!!
How about a compromise? We could open the JonMikal Gallery....
we'd need "real" images for that.
i nevah compromise...just give me the heave ho and i'll shut up. on the other hand, maybe we could have separate galleries for film and digital? :greenpbl:
come on, lets be all we can be!!!!!
I put up a list of how I thought the Galleries should be labeled a while back - if you remember.
I don't like the idea of differentiating between Digital and Film because it pays too much attention to the method of production and ignores the image itself.
If you split B&W and Colour you would have to do duplicate Galleries for each subject - or split each Gallery in two. Problematic. And like Digital/Film it would take the attention away from the image and place it on the method of production again.
Separate names with a comma.