Braineack
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2013
- Messages
- 13,214
- Reaction score
- 5,613
- Location
- NoVA
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Since getting the YN622TX controller and YN622 TTL triggers I decided I wanted a second TTL flash so I could control both when shooting with my flashes. Since I've had good luck with my YN560II I was going to go with a YN565EX.
I heard about this Neewer VK750II for $53 on amazon and figured, "what the hey!"
It gets good reviews, can do TTL and HSS, and has a PC sync port and a power port, something the SB700 nor the YN565EX have.
Out of the box it seems well built, VERY easy to use, and seems to work well with my D600.
I can get into more specifics later, but I decided to put it up against my SB700 in various situations to see how it could handle TTL tasks. So let's dive in:
One thing I noticed right away is that the VK750 seems slight brighter. It also it fills the frame more evenly--it you look, the center of the SB700 is high in the frame, the VK750 hits much closer to the center. Lastly it relies on the D600 to do the WB, so when using the SB700 it was pulling the tint +4-5 to the green side--I do not like that--you can see the tint is off, that's a gray BG.
Now to try TTL against the gray wall:
Nikon brighter this time, but again, the green tint.
Now i wanted to see how it could handle TTL white three different colored subjects on my gray background:
I think the Neewer won here, it overexposed the black cat, but that's how TTL is supposed to work.
Now bounced:
Pretty much a wash here. Nikon seems more even throughout, I'll have to test bounce more.
And off camera, still using TTL:
Again, hard to say between these, I prefer the Neewer, but only because it's a little darker on the shadows.
Finally, testing TTL just shooting in my basement-On camera, pointed straight ahead:
The Nikon seemed to consistently underexpose these shots and the coverage is uneven in the frame, the edges were always vignetted.
One neat positive with the Neewer VK750 when using the YN622: the Neewer actually displays the camera/flash settings. If I change the shutter speed and aperture on the camera I can instantly see the change on the flash. The Nikon only displays the distance to subject. this makes it nice to quickly double check your camera settings with a large display, especially for those with cameras without an LCD.
One low: the zoom motor is loud.
I'll test more later, like HSS. If there are any other types of comparisons you'd like to see just let me know.
I bought that SB-700 refurbished from B&H in 2011 for $300. Compared to a $53 flash with more features, it's getting a good run for its money.
For relativity of that statement, I purchased a Bower SFD926N Digital Autofocus Power Zoom TTL / i-TTL Flash trying to cheap out before I got the SB700 for $150. I had to return it--it hardly even worked.
I heard about this Neewer VK750II for $53 on amazon and figured, "what the hey!"
It gets good reviews, can do TTL and HSS, and has a PC sync port and a power port, something the SB700 nor the YN565EX have.
Out of the box it seems well built, VERY easy to use, and seems to work well with my D600.
I can get into more specifics later, but I decided to put it up against my SB700 in various situations to see how it could handle TTL tasks. So let's dive in:
One thing I noticed right away is that the VK750 seems slight brighter. It also it fills the frame more evenly--it you look, the center of the SB700 is high in the frame, the VK750 hits much closer to the center. Lastly it relies on the D600 to do the WB, so when using the SB700 it was pulling the tint +4-5 to the green side--I do not like that--you can see the tint is off, that's a gray BG.
Now to try TTL against the gray wall:
Nikon brighter this time, but again, the green tint.
Now i wanted to see how it could handle TTL white three different colored subjects on my gray background:
I think the Neewer won here, it overexposed the black cat, but that's how TTL is supposed to work.
Now bounced:
Pretty much a wash here. Nikon seems more even throughout, I'll have to test bounce more.
And off camera, still using TTL:
Again, hard to say between these, I prefer the Neewer, but only because it's a little darker on the shadows.
Finally, testing TTL just shooting in my basement-On camera, pointed straight ahead:
The Nikon seemed to consistently underexpose these shots and the coverage is uneven in the frame, the edges were always vignetted.
One neat positive with the Neewer VK750 when using the YN622: the Neewer actually displays the camera/flash settings. If I change the shutter speed and aperture on the camera I can instantly see the change on the flash. The Nikon only displays the distance to subject. this makes it nice to quickly double check your camera settings with a large display, especially for those with cameras without an LCD.
One low: the zoom motor is loud.
I'll test more later, like HSS. If there are any other types of comparisons you'd like to see just let me know.
I bought that SB-700 refurbished from B&H in 2011 for $300. Compared to a $53 flash with more features, it's getting a good run for its money.
For relativity of that statement, I purchased a Bower SFD926N Digital Autofocus Power Zoom TTL / i-TTL Flash trying to cheap out before I got the SB700 for $150. I had to return it--it hardly even worked.
Last edited: