Just wanted to get any opinions on this subject. I hear people telling each other that it isn't the camera that matters but the photographer. I agree with that idea a little, but I tend to believe it is both the photographer AND the equipment. I figure it like this, give a beginner a thousand dollar camera (Nikon D90 or something) and they'll take snapshots similar to a basic P&S. On the other hand, give a pro a short-lens P&S and nothing else, they will most likely take nice photos but they won't be able to do much for DOF. They won't be able to zoom on a wild creature from a sufficient distance to not scare the animal away. That would take higher quality equipment. Does anyone agree with my idea about equipment and photographer or am I talking out of my posterior?