Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I find this pretty damn odd and to me it seems like your just trying to show of your junk. In the first one you have like half of an erection...which you don't see much in a artistic nude photos and in the second one it looks like your just starring at your dick. I don't know I tried to be open but I find these more like something that isn't a artistic nude shot. Maybe its because in the last two there is such a big focus on your genitalia where in a lot of artistic nude photos I have seen it isn't about their parts but their overall body.
arousal and semi arousal is pornography not art photography in my opinion and the first two for me fall into that category. Art photography is about mind stimulation not bodily...I am imagining these are about what a young man's mind turns to when alone. The quote about 'idle hands' comes to mind then viewing these lol. Photographically the whole set seems quite odd to me, the light is not bad but the compositions don't work for me either and the hoodie...except for maybe a symbolic attachment.
Had the statue of David been sculpted with him in a turgid state, would that still be considered a classic after all these hundreds of years?For the sake of argument:
It seems like you are saying that if a picture features bodily arousal it is automatically pornography and can't be art. That doesn't seem true.
Had the statue of David been sculpted with him in a turgid state, would that still be considered a classic after all these hundreds of years?
Nudes are a study of the human form in its natural state.
there is nothing unnatural about arousal.Nudes are a study of the human form in its natural state.