jakedoza
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2008
- Messages
- 120
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Austin
- Website
- www.jamsessionphoto.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I see a lot of fun in my future..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I had purchased the 24-70 and used it for walk around. Then I got the 16-35 and that became my walk around.
All great lenses, congrats...if you need help breaking them in, I will work with the 200mm for you, you know, I want to help. :mrgreen:
max -- Thanks! I do need to update it though..
msf -- After shooting a little with both I think I am going to like the 24-70 better than the 16-35. Don't get me wrong, the 16-35 is great, but I see using it more for landscape shots or when I'm in a tight situation where I need a wide lens. Yes, it is heavier, but after shooting with the 70-200 it is pretty light.
I had purchased the 24-70 and used it for walk around. Then I got the 16-35 and that became my walk around.
All great lenses, congrats...if you need help breaking them in, I will work with the 200mm for you, you know, I want to help. :mrgreen:
I am trying to decide between the 24-70 and the 16-35! So its cool to find somoene that has both.
If you were to choose just one of them for a wedding, which one would you choose?
Does the 24-70 feel heavy after a while? its twice the weight of the 16-35.
I love your HDR work on your website. that is a beautiful collection of lenses too! I wish i had that kind of money to drop on lenses but I want a new deck instead.