Just messing around (NSFW!)

[WDodd]

Got bored and decided to mess around with photoshop and the model (Alison) wanted me to see what you guys and gals thought.

 

[Sw1tchFX]

I don't mean to offend you or anything, but..


..it looks a little porny.



In my opinion, there's really nothing artistic, aesthetic, or professional about it.

Gorgeous model though!

 

[darich]

Very attractive model but the on board flash makes it........as Sw1tchFX so eolquently put it....."porny"

 

[Alex_B]

i agree with the others, the single flash casts a way too hard shadow, which si very disturbing, in particular on her back.

 

[Alpha]

I might also add that she has no neck...

 

[Jeff Canes]

I might also add that she has no neck...

That’s poorly worded. Maybe if she were not looking directly into camera it would look more natural. She needs to be look to the right of you.

 

[Alpha]

It's not poorly worded...everyone knows what I mean.

 

[Nix]

i guess im the minority... she's hot the picture came out looking "real" not all studio and i doubt you were going for a studio look in a shower.

 

[Alpha]

It looks "real" in the amateur porn sense.

 

[DSLR noob]

The flash combined with a shower scene combined with her deer in a headlights look makes it seem as if you ran into the bathroom said "Hay!" and the took a pic when she turned to see you. I think her head should be tilted back and her face towards the water eyes closed. then her hands in hr hair, and cropped from about 5 cm above the nipple line to above her head. Add some wide aperture bokeh and boom! Art, not porn.

 

[Sw1tchFX]

The flash combined with a shower scene combined with her deer in a headlights look makes it seem as if you ran into the bathroom said "Hay!" and the took a pic when she turned to see you. I think her head should be tilted back and her face towards the water eyes closed. then her hands in hr hair, and cropped from about 5 cm above the nipple line to above her head. Add some wide aperture bokeh and boom! Art, not porn.

That's a completely different picture!

I dunno, the first thing I thought of when I saw this picture was amateur porn.

 

[boogaguy]

She has a nice body at least.
Very very porny...
It just has the generic look at my naked body look that porn pics are know for.
i think the next logical pic in this series would be her bending over to pic up soap or something with you right behind her....

 

[xfloggingkylex]

It's not poorly worded...everyone knows what I mean.

hehe, and we've all come to accept the fact that tact isn't your strong point

with that said, I agree, no neck.

 

[Alpha]

Yeah but it's not something that's entirely specific to this photo. Sure, I could have said, "maybe she should have extended her head forward some," but the larger point is that you should never have a "no neck" look, especially in nudes.

 

[darich]

That’s poorly worded. Maybe if she were not looking directly into camera it would look more nature. She needs to be look to the right of you.

That's poorly worded aswell!!
"would look more natural" not "nature"
:greenpbl: