Kayla- Fashion Portrait

DanOstergren

TPF Supporters
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2013
Messages
4,493
Reaction score
4,141
Every couple of months I get hired by a salon that my friend Russell works in to photograph some models. They basically put on a hair and fashion show/ party. A clothing designer owns a boutique underneath the salon and she dresses the models in her handmade clothing. There are more photos from this set that I'll share, but this is the only one I think I'll be able to finish editing for now.

I used natural light through a window in the hallway staircase that leads up to the salon, after the sun went behind a building across the street. No modifiers, unless you want to get technical, in which case the divider for the staircase acted as a rectangular white reflector. Canon 5D MKI (Classic), Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 set to f/3.5, 1/200th sec, ISO 640.

_mg_7862_by_danostergren-dbleszt.jpg
 
Last edited:
Incredible, especially considering that it was shot using available light. I know you mentioned once that you would post a dodging/burning tutorial, did you ever do that? (Sorry, I've been away from the forum for awhile.) I'd be especially interested to see how a shot like this would start out. Natural light seems to follow different laws of physics for you than for me. :p
 
Beautiful skin tone, Dan. Are there any tips on exposure when shooting dark skin complexions you'd share. I tried to shoot two beautiful dark skinned babies, for a friend recently and failed miserably. It seemed like the there was tendency for the shadows to have posterization.
 
Great shot.

Sounds like you have a great opportunity to get some cool photos.
Thank you.

Even better that I get paid to do it! This time they paid my fee and gifted me a case of Barbera that was delicious!
 
Incredible, especially considering that it was shot using available light. I know you mentioned once that you would post a dodging/burning tutorial, did you ever do that? (Sorry, I've been away from the forum for awhile.) I'd be especially interested to see how a shot like this would start out. Natural light seems to follow different laws of physics for you than for me. :p
To me natural light is very much the same as artificial. It's all about the way it sculpts the person's features, not about the light source itself.

I'm still planning to make some retouching videos and TPF will be the first place I share them for free, hopefully with some actions as well. I work a lot though, both at my day job and photography, so it's a process that's taking more time than I expected.
 
Beautiful skin tone, Dan. Are there any tips on exposure when shooting dark skin complexions you'd share. I tried to shoot two beautiful dark skinned babies, for a friend recently and failed miserably. It seemed like the there was tendency for the shadows to have posterization.
I don't approach it any differently. I just make sure the exposure is accurate to how I like it. I don't tend to use the histogram, as the screen on the back of my old 5D MKI seems to be very accurate. If it looks good on the back of my camera, I'm happy.
 
Incredible, especially considering that it was shot using available light. I know you mentioned once that you would post a dodging/burning tutorial, did you ever do that? (Sorry, I've been away from the forum for awhile.) I'd be especially interested to see how a shot like this would start out. Natural light seems to follow different laws of physics for you than for me. :p
To me natural light is very much the same as artificial. It's all about the way it sculpts the person's features, not about the light source itself.

I'm still planning to make some retouching videos and TPF will be the first place I share them for free, hopefully with some actions as well. I work a lot though, both at my day job and photography, so it's a process that's taking more time than I expected.

That would be amazing!

I've been thinking lately that it's possible that it isn't my natural light shooting skills that are lacking as much as my post processing skills. I follow another photographer on Facebook who does amazing natural light portraits. Awhile back he started showing some before and after shots, and I realized that he isn't really finding completely magical light. He's just using shots that I would have thrown out for being too "flat." The natural light is only faintly sculpting the features, so I throw it out and turn on the flash. But maybe I just need to learn how to emphasize the light that's already there.

I have watched some dodging/burning tutorials and tried them out, but I feel like I'm overdoing it or underdoing it or something. It's a tricky thing to balance just right.
 
Excellent as always Dan!
 
Incredible, especially considering that it was shot using available light. I know you mentioned once that you would post a dodging/burning tutorial, did you ever do that? (Sorry, I've been away from the forum for awhile.) I'd be especially interested to see how a shot like this would start out. Natural light seems to follow different laws of physics for you than for me. :p
To me natural light is very much the same as artificial. It's all about the way it sculpts the person's features, not about the light source itself.

I'm still planning to make some retouching videos and TPF will be the first place I share them for free, hopefully with some actions as well. I work a lot though, both at my day job and photography, so it's a process that's taking more time than I expected.

That would be amazing!

I've been thinking lately that it's possible that it isn't my natural light shooting skills that are lacking as much as my post processing skills. I follow another photographer on Facebook who does amazing natural light portraits. Awhile back he started showing some before and after shots, and I realized that he isn't really finding completely magical light. He's just using shots that I would have thrown out for being too "flat." The natural light is only faintly sculpting the features, so I throw it out and turn on the flash. But maybe I just need to learn how to emphasize the light that's already there.

I have watched some dodging/burning tutorials and tried them out, but I feel like I'm overdoing it or underdoing it or something. It's a tricky thing to balance just right.
Do not subscribe to the belief that editing trumps lighting or comes anywhere near being as important, because that is absolutely wrong. Without light there would be no photograph, so lighting should be the single most important aspect of your photograph. The light should be doing the sculpting for you. Most good retouchers emulate a makeup technique called contouring and highlighting with their dodging and burning, but I don't have much time to spend editing a photo, so I choose to emulate the makeup technique's sculpting pattern with the lighting. This not only saves me time and pain by not having to edit and retouch as much, it sculpts your subject naturally and basically gives you lines to follow in case you do need to enhance the contour with dodging and burning. I have clients who request unedited photos, and following this principle of getting the lighting right at exposure ensures that I can still deliver quality photos that I'm proud of.

Mainly what I use dodging and burning for is to clear the skin, and sometimes to create cleaner lines. Here's a before/ after of the photo from this thread. Editing was minimal. Everything else revolves around the lighting, the camera settings, the model and the styling. Editing is only a small part, and if the client did not pay for retouching I would be perfectly happy delivering the unedited shots to them (after removing dust spots).
_mg_7862_by_danostergren-dblet1g.jpg
 
Last edited:
Incredible, especially considering that it was shot using available light. I know you mentioned once that you would post a dodging/burning tutorial, did you ever do that? (Sorry, I've been away from the forum for awhile.) I'd be especially interested to see how a shot like this would start out. Natural light seems to follow different laws of physics for you than for me. :p
To me natural light is very much the same as artificial. It's all about the way it sculpts the person's features, not about the light source itself.

I'm still planning to make some retouching videos and TPF will be the first place I share them for free, hopefully with some actions as well. I work a lot though, both at my day job and photography, so it's a process that's taking more time than I expected.

That would be amazing!

I've been thinking lately that it's possible that it isn't my natural light shooting skills that are lacking as much as my post processing skills. I follow another photographer on Facebook who does amazing natural light portraits. Awhile back he started showing some before and after shots, and I realized that he isn't really finding completely magical light. He's just using shots that I would have thrown out for being too "flat." The natural light is only faintly sculpting the features, so I throw it out and turn on the flash. But maybe I just need to learn how to emphasize the light that's already there.

I have watched some dodging/burning tutorials and tried them out, but I feel like I'm overdoing it or underdoing it or something. It's a tricky thing to balance just right.
Do not subscribe to the belief that editing trumps lighting or comes anywhere near being as important, because that is absolutely wrong. Without light there would be no photograph, so lighting should be the single most important aspect of your photograph. The light should be doing the sculpting for you. Most good retouchers emulate a makeup technique called contouring and highlighting with their dodging and burning, but I don't have much time to spend editing a photo, so I choose to emulate the makeup technique's sculpting pattern with the lighting. This not only saves me time and pain by not having to edit and retouch as much, it sculpts your subject naturally and basically gives you lines to follow in case you do need to enhance the contour with dodging and burning. I have clients who request unedited photos, and following this principle of getting the lighting right at exposure ensures that I can still deliver quality photos that I'm proud of.

Mainly what I use dodging and burning for is to clear the skin, and sometimes to create cleaner lines. Here's a before/ after of the photo from this thread. Editing was minimal. Everything else revolves around the lighting, the camera settings, the model and the styling. Editing is only a small part, and if the client did not pay for retouching I would be perfectly happy delivering the unedited shots to them (after removing dust spots).
_mg_7862_by_danostergren-dbkmmi3.jpg

Wow, your before/after is nothing like his...and you're right, it could be delivered as is.

Back to practicing for me!! Thank you so much!
 
Incredible, especially considering that it was shot using available light. I know you mentioned once that you would post a dodging/burning tutorial, did you ever do that? (Sorry, I've been away from the forum for awhile.) I'd be especially interested to see how a shot like this would start out. Natural light seems to follow different laws of physics for you than for me. :p
To me natural light is very much the same as artificial. It's all about the way it sculpts the person's features, not about the light source itself.

I'm still planning to make some retouching videos and TPF will be the first place I share them for free, hopefully with some actions as well. I work a lot though, both at my day job and photography, so it's a process that's taking more time than I expected.

That would be amazing!

I've been thinking lately that it's possible that it isn't my natural light shooting skills that are lacking as much as my post processing skills. I follow another photographer on Facebook who does amazing natural light portraits. Awhile back he started showing some before and after shots, and I realized that he isn't really finding completely magical light. He's just using shots that I would have thrown out for being too "flat." The natural light is only faintly sculpting the features, so I throw it out and turn on the flash. But maybe I just need to learn how to emphasize the light that's already there.

I have watched some dodging/burning tutorials and tried them out, but I feel like I'm overdoing it or underdoing it or something. It's a tricky thing to balance just right.
Do not subscribe to the belief that editing trumps lighting or comes anywhere near being as important, because that is absolutely wrong. Without light there would be no photograph, so lighting should be the single most important aspect of your photograph. The light should be doing the sculpting for you. Most good retouchers emulate a makeup technique called contouring and highlighting with their dodging and burning, but I don't have much time to spend editing a photo, so I choose to emulate the makeup technique's sculpting pattern with the lighting. This not only saves me time and pain by not having to edit and retouch as much, it sculpts your subject naturally and basically gives you lines to follow in case you do need to enhance the contour with dodging and burning. I have clients who request unedited photos, and following this principle of getting the lighting right at exposure ensures that I can still deliver quality photos that I'm proud of.

Mainly what I use dodging and burning for is to clear the skin, and sometimes to create cleaner lines. Here's a before/ after of the photo from this thread. Editing was minimal. Everything else revolves around the lighting, the camera settings, the model and the styling. Editing is only a small part, and if the client did not pay for retouching I would be perfectly happy delivering the unedited shots to them (after removing dust spots).
_mg_7862_by_danostergren-dbkmmi3.jpg

Wow, your before/after is nothing like his...and you're right, it could be delivered as is.

Back to practicing for me!! Thank you so much!
No problem. I used to believe that photos needed extensive amounts of editing and retouching, but when I discovered that I should be letting the light do that work it changed everything, both in terms of time saving and being able to create better quality photos.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top