Kit Lens & 50mm difference

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by peekay, Nov 14, 2009.

  1. peekay

    peekay TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    /
     
    Last edited: Jan 6, 2010
  2. Pugs

    Pugs TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    The faster 50mm will give you nicer bokeh, shallower depth of field, better image quality, sharper focus, etc...
     
  3. chip

    chip TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cypress, CA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    on a 1.6x crop frame body, the 50mm would be a 80mm. Not a very useful general purpose focal length. It maybe good for portraits. A 33mm would be a good "normal" lens for a 1.6x crop frame Canon body.
     
  4. cfusionpm

    cfusionpm TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2009
    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    The 50mm f/1.8 II is an OK lens. It's a small step up from the kit lens, and the f/1.8 offers good background blur, but the optics are so-so. It's a prime lens, so it's not that bad, but it's not going to be as good as the 1.4 or 1.2. The 1.2 is ludicrously expensive, but the 1.4 is a pretty reasonable ~400$. It offers better image quality, USM focusing, and full time manual focusing. I originally bought a 1.8 and a few months later, sold it for the 1.4 instead.
     
  5. seekinglight

    seekinglight TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Depends on what you are shooting. The zoom lens is too slow for indoor sports. I use 50mm -but I have a pass to be at courtside so the short focal length (on my 1.6 crop camera) is not a problem when action is near the net. The f1.8 lens was too slow to focus. I upgraded to the f1.4 because it's motor focused faster.
    I've never taken my 50mm lens down to f3.5 - I love shallow depth of field so my subject stands out and the background is blurr. Go to a camera store, put the f1.8 lens on your camera and at f1.8 photograph a person who is standing out in the open (not against a wall!) from very close range -say 5 feet. Take the same shot with your zoom lens at the same focal length. One shot will look great -almost a 3-D affect. The other shot will look the same as you would get with a $100 Kodak. If you like what you see, do the right thing and buy from that store.
     
  6. Sw1tchFX

    Sw1tchFX TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,500
    Likes Received:
    478
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    The 50mm f/1.8 should be MUCH sharper than the 18-55 at 50mm f/5.6.
     
  7. dcmountaineer

    dcmountaineer TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    The 1.8 (aka, 'Nifty-50', 'plastic wonder') is great. But keep in mind, you get what you pay for. Since you can find it most places for $90-100, the build quality is not going to compare to the 1.4.

    However, you can get great shots with the 1.8. If you want a cheap, sharp prime lens - this fits the bill. But keep a more flexible lens in your arsenal (18-55, etc) for everyday shots.
     

Share This Page