Kodak 320 TXP

Discussion in 'The Darkroom' started by santino, May 9, 2006.

  1. santino

    santino TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,240
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Austria, heart in Poland -->
    Hi!

    Is there much difference between the normal TriX and the 320 TXP? just curious :D
     
  2. Jeff Canes

    Jeff Canes No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,190
    Likes Received:
    22
    Location:
    Hollywood, FLA USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Recall mistakenly buying some at a camera show maybe 2 years ago. But don’t recall anything special about it
     
  3. JamesD

    JamesD Between darkrooms

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Living in Snapshot reality.
    After digging out the big book of datasheets, this is what Kodak has to say:

    Tri-X 400 is faster than 320. They have wide exposure latitude, and 400 is recommended (by Kodak) for pushing. Both are, of course, standard BW-process films.

    I've used both at least once, and I don't recall anything special about them either, nor any special difference between the two. Of course, at the time, I was point-n-shooting, and not really aware of what I was looking for (or wasn't looking for, depending on how you look at it).

    Oh, and apparently, Tri-X 400 isn't offered in sheet film. Hmm. There are also slight differences in the filtered exposure adjustment recommendations, development times, etc, etc.

    Thus says the big book of datasheets. Anybody else with some information of a more useful character?
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
320txp
,
320 txp
,
320txp film
,
kodak 320
,

kodak 320 txp

,

kodak 320txp

,
kodak 320txp film
,
kodak txp
,
kodak txp 320
,
txp 320