Discussion in 'Articles of Interest' started by nerwin, Jun 10, 2017.
Is that some kind of photography cult?
Not a cult. Just a derogatory term for amateurs.
Also Man With a Camera.
You are a newbie aren't you.
There are to many old posts these days to even be counted as a plethora, where someone, often a female but not always, writes something along the lines of:
"Hi I am a stay at home mom who has always really loved pictures and photography. I just bought my first camera, a (insert your favorite consumer grade brand here) and I want to start a part time business to make some money photographing babies and children. What kind of lens should I get and what is the best setting to photograph babies and kids."
I'm just pulling your chain. Hehe.
Actually it deals more with the uninformed, overly excited, pie in the sky dreamer types.
But Man With a Camera is different than Guy With a Camera. You don't want to call a MWC a GWC.
Which could also be called a Girl With Camera or a Gorilla with Camera, or even a Green Mountain Stater With Camera.
Ohhhh you funny.
Oh my goodness, The Truman Show. Its been a long time since I've seen that.
They're just trying to make money. I mean, is $100 really going to stop a wedding/engagement or family portrait shoot? Nope. So it's not to limit traffic. Just a money-making scheme IMO. If it morphs into something more, then I'll be concerned.
Separate names with a comma.