Lens to rent for travel: 24-105 or 28-300?

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by Laser180481, Dec 6, 2008.

  1. Laser180481
    Offline

    Laser180481 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Newburyport, MA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Traveling to Ecuador next month so I plan on renting a quality Canon "L" series lens to take with me. I'm considering the 24-105mm or the 28-300mm and was looking for recommendations.

    I hear the 28-300 will get pretty heavy as I walk around but I thought the extra reach would be nice at some times. I'll be visiting the Galapagos, so I'd like to get close ups of some of the wildlife - namely turtles, lizards, birds, penguins, and boobies.

    For those of you who know, how big is the 28-300?

    Cheers.
  2. BTilson
    Offline

    BTilson New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Western NC, USA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Haha, right on! I like to take pictures of boobies too! :lmao: Sorry, couldn't resist!

    Now to be serious, I don't know how big the 28-300 is, but for a single walkaround lens, I'd definitely think it would be nice to have that extra reach. 105mm isn't really that long of a reach, even on a crop body.
  3. soylentgreen
    Offline

    soylentgreen New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    If wildlife is your main subject, get the reach with either a 28-300 or 100-400L (a bit lighter). You are probably not going to get too close to those boobies. :mrgreen: For everyday snaps and sunrises, sunsets, landscapes; the stock lens will do. You usually stop down anyway unless you go PJ style and need the large aperature. Ideally get both. I got the 24-105 for my cruise but no wildlife was involved, just boobies.
  4. Laser180481
    Offline

    Laser180481 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Newburyport, MA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Let me clarify, boobies will certainly be the focus of this expedition. So far I've been hearing that reach is good. Anyone else?
  5. Pure
    Offline

    Pure New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
24-300 canon
,
24-300 lens canon
,

24-105 vs 28-300

,
28-300 or 24-105
,

28-300 vs 24-105

,

28-300mm vs 24-105mm

,

canon 24-105 vs 28-300

,
canon 24-105 vs 28-300 l lenses
,
canon 24-300
,

canon 28-300 vs 24-105

,
canon ef 24-105mm versus canon 28-300
,
canon ef 28-300mm v 24-105
,
canon ef 28-300mm vs 24 105
,
canon lens 24-300.
,
canon lenses 24-300
,
ef 24 105 28 300
,
new canon 28-300 planned
,
nikon 28-300 vs 24-105
,
nikon 28-300mm vs 24-105
,
traveling to the galapagos with only canon 24-105 lens