Lense Hood for Canon 50mm f/1.8...worth it?

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by bobaab, Sep 23, 2006.

  1. bobaab
    Offline

    bobaab New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Park Ridge, IL/West Lafayette, IN
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    That's basically my question...how much would having a lense hood make a difference? I really havent had experience with a lense hood, so I dont know how it makes a difference in photo's. If anyone can tell me general advice, please do so! If anyone can give me advice specifically on the lense hood for the Canon 50mm f/1.8, that would be even better! Thanks in advance :)
  2. LWW
    Offline

    LWW New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,206
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Dayton,Ohio
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0
    I always use them. They will help keep off to the side light sources from creating flare in your photos. They will also be the first line of defense keeping things from hitting the glass if you are in the woods, or a heavy crowd, or ever drop something.

    They are also pretty cheap. There are aftermarket closes also which work quite well which are even cheaper.

    LWW
  3. Big Mike
    Online

    Big Mike I am Big, I am Mike Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    33,507
    Likes Received:
    1,719
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1,721 / 0
    Go out in the sun and look through the viewfinder & lens with the sun hitting the lens but not in the scene. The hold your hand over the lens like a hood, to block the sun. Notice how the image through the lens changes...it should seem a little dimer to you but it will have more contrast. That's the idea of a hood, to keep stray light from getting into the lens and causing a loss of contrast, saturation, sharpness etc.
  4. JIP
    Offline

    JIP New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,019
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Pittsburgh PA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    Lens hoods are very important especially when shooting outside in the sun even though you may not see a glare in your viewfinder alot of times it still may affect your image
  5. stumpfoot
    Offline

    stumpfoot New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    What about the differnt designs? I have seen the solid round ones and ones that look like flowers, is one betterthen the other?
  6. Big Mike
    Online

    Big Mike I am Big, I am Mike Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    33,507
    Likes Received:
    1,719
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1,721 / 0
    The more area around the lens that is covered...the more effective the hood will be. However, if it's too deep or small...it will cause vignetting. The 'petal' style hoods are made for specific lenses and cover as much as they can, without getting in the way.

    For my 50mm F1.8, I have a cheap collapsible rubber hood that I got for $5.
  7. Don Simon
    Offline

    Don Simon New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,484
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Ditto, I paid £1 for an old Nikon lens hood and it fits any lens with a 49mm filter thread, which to me is better than one which only fits on one lens and costs 10-20x as much. As long as it fits and does the job.

    Now my Tokina and Tamron zooms, and even my own-brand kit lens, all came with their own lens hoods. The one on the kit lens even has a little removeable tab so I can rotate filters easily... yet no hood with the primes. Pay more and get less eh :|
  8. DeepSpring
    Offline

    DeepSpring New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,451
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    I have the same rubber style hood Mike was talking about on my 50mm. It's cheap and can't hurt to have. No reason to not get it.
  9. rmh159
    Offline

    rmh159 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,028
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    The thing about a lens hood is when it's on it doesn't do any noticable affect to the pic. It's not like you'll look at the pic and think "Ahhhhh that lens hood affect was beautiful." but if you take a shot with the sun just out of frame without the lens hood you'll see pretty quickly how a shot can go to hell without it.

    Keep in mind also that you can't Photoshop out a lens flare. If it's there you're basically f-ed unless by some chance it works with the pic.

    On the subject of lens flare isn't it odd that as photographers we struggle like mad to avoid it and then Photoshop has an entire affect section dedicated to adding it back in? I guess control is the issue but it's still a head-scratcher.
  10. Pixel9ine
    Offline

    Pixel9ine New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    Same here. I know Canon has a specific hood for this lens (and I've got dedicated hoods for my 17-85, 85/1.8 and 70-200), but the little 52mm rubber ones work great if needed.

    Think, too, that the front element of the 50mm 1.8 sits pretty far back in the lens barrel, so flare is not as big as issue on this lens to begin with.

Share This Page