Metering, when will i ever get it!!!!!!!!!!!

puyjapin

TPF Noob!
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
Location
Warwickshire UK
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
I still dont get it, no matr how hard i try !
Ok i understand the principle that i can dial in less or more exposure when in aperture mode, by adjusting the exposure in aperture this overridesthe shutter speed te camera selects yes?
What i dont get is the principle of pointing the camera at part of the scene to 'meter ' off of it? OK i can point the camera, but what does this actually tell me and what do i do to compensate what its telling me. For example have a look at this shot i took earlier, it was a bright sunset so i put a Grad ND in nd used aperture mode. i set the aperture to 7.1 and it selected a shutter speed of 1/30 sec. I tried adjusting the exposure and this was the best result. I just dont seem happy with it and i dont quite know why....
Also i set the iso to 200, perhaps i should have upped it a bit but when i open it in picassa its telling me the iso is 1000, which it was not set to.
Anyway any help or c 'n' c would be very helpful. Hopefully one day i will understand metering...!
Bench.jpg
 
Theres no reason for you to set an AP value of 7.1 in this scene if the subject is the bench. F/4 would have more than sufficed.

Metering is simply your camera measuring the tonality values of the area around the focus point depending on the type of metering you have chosen. That's it. No special magic trick about it. What you point at, is what the camera is going to calculate for. If you point at a dark spot, its going to meter off that dark spot. If you point at a bright spot, it'll meter off that.
 
Think my lens only goes to 5.6 on max zoom :(
So can I get this clear,i normally use matrix metering.....if i focus on the dark bit its likely to overexpose the bright bit coz its going to use a shutter speed to allow for the darkness area, but if i focus on the bright bit it will underexpose the dark bit...correct? if thats the case how on earth do i expose everything correctly? or is that basically impossible. I mean i see shots of white bears on snow and they look fine or dark skin on light backdrop without it all overexposed. Is there no method that requires the camera to be pointed at a area of the scene then re pointed to compose the shot or is this nothing to do with metering?
 
Think my lens only goes to 5.6 on max zoom

Err.

So can I get this clear,i normally use matrix metering.....if i focus on the dark bit its likely to overexpose the bright bit coz its going to use a shutter speed to allow for the darkness area, but if i focus on the bright bit it will underexpose the dark bit...correct? if thats the case how on earth do i expose everything correctly?

You don't. A camera does not have the same dynamic range that your eyeball does. You either live with blown out spots or really dark spots (the latter is usually preferred), or you compose the photograph so that the range (from dark to light) is manageable (like moving the camera to get the sun out of the shot).

I mean i see shots of white bears on snow and they look fine or dark skin on light backdrop without it all overexposed. Is there no method that requires the camera to be pointed at a area of the scene then re pointed to compose the shot or is this nothing to do with metering?

White bear on snow doesn't neccessarily have a high dynamic range. In fact its range is pretty controllable since its in the lighter area. If you had something dark though, it would probably be clipped in the "dark" side of the range.
 
to be honest im trying all sorts of shots at the moment....
its a kit lens with my D40 so its a 3.5-5.6 which presumable is not great in terms of max aperture?....
Im considering getting a 70-300 vr which I believe still does not have a particularly large aperture. generally those lenses with low f numbers are very expensive,esp the zoom range i was considering :( would the 70-300 be a nice lens for wildlife and such like? thanks for all ur help by the way
 
i tend to use matrix metering....good or bad or indifferent !!?!
 
your kit lens should go down to like /3.5 or something mine does
 
metering cliff note version:

on a sunny day point your cam to the blue sky (this is in manual mode mind you) and adjust your shutter and aperture until they're centered in the might meter bar either in your view finder, or your info screen. on a bright sunny day pay more attention to shutter and vice versa on a cloudy day.

Once you get it centered in the light meter, point the cam back at your subject without changing any of the settings and take your shot, its also helpful to pre balance on the subject before doing any of this
 
metering cliff note version:

on a sunny day point your cam to the blue sky (this is in manual mode mind you) and adjust your shutter and aperture until they're centered in the might meter bar either in your view finder, or your info screen. on a bright sunny day pay more attention to shutter and vice versa on a cloudy day.

Once you get it centered in the light meter, point the cam back at your subject without changing any of the settings and take your shot, its also helpful to pre balance on the subject before doing any of this

All that would do, ESPECIALLY if he has taken the sky out of his composition, is meter darker parts of the picture as if they were actually lighter parts. So that wouldn't neccessarily be the way to go.

i tend to use matrix metering....good or bad or indifferent !!?!

Matrix metering is fine for most situations. However, where I feel it takes a ****, is areas of high dynamic range. If theres enough light in the shot, but the point you are focusing on isn't that bright, you'll run into problem. Center weighted is cool, because it says, to look at this point, and the area around it. It will still look at the entire scene, but will give most weight to the middle. Spot is just that, it meters for ONLY that focus point, regardless of if you have the mf'ing sun 2 inches away.
 
your kit lens should go down to like f/3.5 or something
That's on the wide end. When it's zoomed out he's stuck with f/5.6. Between the two ends the aperture size will vary.
 
so in the above shot would have been better in manual mode, point the cam at an area of mid brightness say between the bench and the sun, adjust the meter bar tosomewhere in the centre then re compose shot? would that work? Im getting to understad it a bit more now, thanks to your help. I am also looking forward to getting ' understanding exposure' next week!
 
so in the above shot would have been better in manual mode, point the cam at an area of mid brightness say between the bench and the sun, adjust the meter bar tosomewhere in the centre then re compose shot? would that work? Im getting to understad it a bit more now, thanks to your help. I am also looking forward to getting ' understanding exposure' next week!

No. Well, not for my tastes. If the bench is your subject, point the camera at the bench and have it compose for the bench. Then using your experience with how various shutter speeds and ap combos produce an exposure, fine tune to YOUR tastes. What classifies a "good exposure" is often as much about the technical qualities as it is the aesthetic of the shot.
 
Also, I think this does the same as doing it the way ANDS! said, and is what you were looking for:
In one of your semi-auto modes, you can point the camera as the area you want to meter off of, then hold down the Exposure/Focus lock button. Keep that button held down and recompose your picture. I think that's what you were trying to have explained for the last 2 threads.

But that may not help, because as others have said, if there is too much dynamic range in the shot, the camera can't handle it. The only way I know of besides using the Grad ND or some other filter, is to make an HDR exposure.
 
ok, so another quik question. why do you need to point the camera at anotherarea and then adjust the aperture/shutter before re composing? why not just point the camera at what u want to photograph and adjust the exposure there?
whats your opinion of that bench shot for example? I mean i wanted the left side of the bench more in focus but when i set the left bracket as my focus zone it simply refused to focus hence the only way i could focus was in the central bracket thus it changed the perspective i wanted in terms of the bench gradually getting less focussed as the pic moves to the right of thebench...plus as u said that lens, not great...is the 70-300 f4 a decent purchase?
 

Most reactions

Back
Top