MY FIRST REAL TRY ON CAR PHOTOGRAPHY (NEED FEEDBACKS)

Discussion in 'General Gallery' started by rein, Jun 18, 2008.

  1. rein

    rein TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 17, 2008
    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    1)my background: Had my camera(rebel xti) for about 8 months,been reading on books/forums/tutorials etc. practicing alot. right now im just trying to learn.

    2)did this shoot with my friends the other day,right now i am focusing on car photography(which is what got me into photography) learning and at the same time enjoying my hobby.

    3) pls leave me FEEDBACKS and ADVICES, i shot these with a 18-55 standard lense and some with the 50 mm f 1.8

    THANK YOU!

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. cszakolczai

    cszakolczai TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    the ones of the S2000 seem to be the best, the last one seems washed out, others seem a little overexposed. I really do like the 3rd one with the head on shot of the S2000, thats an awesome picture. The STI needs a drop badly as well haha. Overall I like them a lot, just a little bit here and there.
     
  3. Battou

    Battou No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    7,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    Slapamonkey, New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    #1 and #4 look great.

    With the exceptions of #1 and #4 the rest of your BGs needs some work or either shallower or deeper DOF.

    #'s 1, 2, 3 and 9...the licence plate, I know the concept of removing the plate but the tactic you chose is detrimental, Use your cloning tool and scramble the tag numbers. #1 is gourgous except for that blob formerly known as a licence plate. A licence plate that looks legit but isn't has a better feel to it.

    #2 is a little soft

    #5 is a little over processed and washed.

    #8 and #3 have good angles but the vehicle next to them should be moved for future reference.

    #9....By all outward appearences the subject of that one is the licenceplate.....witch is scratch tooled out.

    Your watermarking tactic is sound, I do like the placements of those, they are not impeding on anything.
     
  4. thinkricky

    thinkricky TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 28, 2008
    Messages:
    517
    Likes Received:
    25
    Location:
    Texas
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Pino?

    Awesome shots. love the S2000.
     
  5. Senor Hound

    Senor Hound TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    La la land...
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    You really nailed the white balance, kudos for that. Some of them could use a change of DOF like other said. I liked 1, 3, 4, and 8. I also like the location of the shot, its very "street racer," if that makes sense. :)

    Also, if privacy is an issue, I would blur the licenses harder. I could make out the plate on a few, if you care.

    I like the car on the end of the first photo. It looks like its just one flowing curve from front to back... :) What is it?
     
  6. ericmo

    ericmo TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    tampa fl
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    looks like the honda civic si, great series!
     
  7. Village Idiot

    Village Idiot No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    7,274
    Likes Received:
    406
    Location:
    Shepherdsturd, WV / Almost, MD
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    You really think that? I disagree with the technical aspects of the first.

    As long as nailed means off by a shade or three...

    OP -

    1 is extremely blown. So much so that the Civic doesn't have a fender line any more. The WB is also off. The closest car doesn't look so bad, but the two Hondas are yellow. You can fix this by adjusting the WB in PS, but doing it in camera is a much better idea. Having one less thing to fix in post is always better.

    2 soft. Looks like you added some filter afterwards or had a foggy lens. Which ever it was, it was a bit too much.

    3 not bad. WB looks good. Contrast is a bit high, but that's personal taste.

    4 red.

    5 red.

    6 not bad.

    7 WB looks a little off. I like the framing with the fence.

    8 Not bad. Car in the background could go

    9 Looks like a soft snap shot.

    Biggest thing you could do to help is learn about lighting and either buy some equipment or learn how to position the cars under ambient and work with it so you get correct whites.
     
  8. Battou

    Battou No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    7,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    Slapamonkey, New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Not entirely, I just did not want to be a total asshat, I agree with you there are some issues with the first, I have a lot of head scratching going on with that one trying to figure out if it was intentional or not but none the less thoes two where the only ones I liked.
     
  9. rein

    rein TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 17, 2008
    Messages:
    171
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    thanks for all the replies, here is my summary of questions

    1.washed out means?

    2.all of those shots were under hard yellow lighting,which of my WB options would make it cooler?

    3.i was kinda in a hurry taking those pics,(i guess i learned not too now,i was excited) Higher depth of field meaning higher F stop right? what would you guys recommend?

    4) i have the standard and the nifty fifty lense. with this kind of photography, what lense/or tool should i need to get,to have better pictures?

    thanks to all of you, youve all beeen helpfull
     
  10. Battou

    Battou No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    7,997
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    Slapamonkey, New York
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    1.washed out means? - Lacking or weak in color, unnaturally Pale


    2.all of those shots were under hard yellow lighting,which of my WB options would make it cooler?
    - Not in my field.......I have no answer for you

    3.i was kinda in a hurry taking those pics,(i guess i learned not too now,i was excited) what would you guys recommend? - No, Patients...take your time, if some one wants you to take pictures of their car they will want it done right not fast. take it slower and get it right the first time.

    Higher depth of field meaning higher F stop right? - No, deeper DOF is higher F/#, higher the F/# the sharper the background is, the smaller the F/# the more shallower the DOF.


    4) i have the standard and the nifty fifty lense. with this kind of photography, what lense/or tool should i need to get,to have better pictures?
    - Lenses and tools can only take you so far, practice makes perfect.
     
  11. Parkerman

    Parkerman TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    982
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    North Alabama
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Washed out means it no longer has any detail... Blown out.. Over exposed.

    Not sure about the WB, I pick the one that works best with afew test shots.. and if its not good enough i correct in lightroom or PS.

    F22 would have a great DOF, where 1.8f would have a shallow DOF [giving you the blured background]

    You getting an off camera flash would be good. The main thing is your lighting. Try to take some pictures during the afternoon sometime.
     
  12. reignmkr

    reignmkr TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2008
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    The term is pinoy but I'm sure it was a spelling error.

    Great series of photos BTW.
     

Share This Page