New cameras worse than old ones?

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by cupax, Dec 28, 2007.

  1. cupax

    cupax TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I don't know if I have a wrong view on the world, but I have a feeling that newer cameras have worse pictures than old ones. Here I mean cameras with less pixels have sharper pictures with less noise. I think this makes some sense, since if you put more pixels on a same chip size, they have to be smaller so they need more light, resulting in needing of higher ISOs, noise compression and exposure times. If you reduce pixels on a high pixel camera it will just use a smaller part of it's chip, so the picture will not be better. (I'm not sure about all that, I'm just guessing here).

    I'm writing this because I just returned a brand new Panasonic TZ3 which was a big disapointment because of very dull, non sharp pictures. And looking back to my photo albums I realised, that from all cameras I've had my favorite is still my first, a FujiFilm 2600, a 2MP compact camera. Yes maybe it wasn't the best "natural" camera, but I love it's sharpness and strong, almost cartoonish colors.

    So since I never print my pictures, never do any post production (so I don't care about pixels), where can I find a camera that has less noise possible, as sharp as it can be and have strong colors?
     
  2. usayit

    usayit No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2003
    Messages:
    9,523
    Likes Received:
    344
    Location:
    North New Jersey, United States of America
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I still think that technology moves forward at enough rate that in general the newest cameras are an improvement.

    In terms of film cameras, hell yeh.. the older ones were generally built better.
     
  3. Sideburns

    Sideburns TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    Messages:
    2,796
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    You are kinda off...
    The only reason your old pictures look better to you is probably because the jpeg gets over saturated and whatnot in the camera before you get to it. That's all.

    I think most GOOD cameras...the picture is kind of boring when it comes out of the camera most times. However, after post processing, it shows the true potential.

    If you want the sharpest camera with the best potential for a nice picture, you want an SLR. Canon, Nikon, Pentax...whatever. Pick one that feels nice in your hand and get it.

    You WILL post process if you want good pictures. There's really no way around this other than buying a crappy point and shoot that overdoes the picture when it saves the jpeg.
     
  4. Big Mike

    Big Mike I am Big, I am Mike Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    33,822
    Likes Received:
    1,811
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Yes, you are somewhat right that cramming more pixels onto a tiny chip will give you more digital noise and maybe other problems...but the image should still be sharp.

    There are plenty of factors at work here. The processor in the camera will have a lot to do with the noise levels...this technology is improving all the time.
    The quality of the lens is a big factor.

    A big part of the problem is that most digital cameras have sensors that are still very small.

    Digital SLR cameras have sensors that are much bigger than 98% of digital camera. This allows for an image with less noise. Most lenses for SLR cameras are better than a typical digi-cam lens...but you can also use top quality lenses with are much better.
     
  5. Garbz

    Garbz No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    203
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Could also be with the increase in sensor resolution when you zoom to 100% you are gradually showing more and more lens limitations. Imagine how blurry the Hassleblad H3D would be with the kit 18-55mm from Nikon on it.
     
  6. adolan20

    adolan20 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Could it be that camera sensors have gotten smaller as society is looking for a smaller camera that is "pocketable?"
     
  7. cupax

    cupax TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I see most of you are professionals or at least prosumers. I'm not, I don't need a SLR but a point'n'shoot pocket size camera that requires no postprocessing.

    Here are some test photos so you judge:
    (All photos are taken in full automatic mode with auto flash, 100% cutout - no resampling)

    Panasonic TZ3:
    http://www.cheppadorro.com/TZ3_tree.jpg
    http://www.cheppadorro.com/TZ3_jesus.jpg

    FujiFilm S5100:
    http://www.cheppadorro.com/S5100_tree.jpg
    http://www.cheppadorro.com/S5100_jesus.jpg

    My good old FujiFilm 2600:
    http://www.cheppadorro.com/2600_table.jpg
    http://www.cheppadorro.com/2600_chicago.jpg

    Comparing the TZ3 and S5100 (both 10x optical zoom) they produce a lot of noise but the S5100 is way more balanced and sharp, while the TZ3 is just awfull.
    Then I look back at my 2600 (died on me a few years ago), at the party table picture that is just wonderful, especially if you consider it was made in a dark room.
     
  8. Alex_B

    Alex_B No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    14,491
    Likes Received:
    206
    Location:
    Europe 67.51°N
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    didn't have a look at those images, but from personal experience with friend's cameras I seem to see a trend that some follow up models of cameras 1 or 2 years old have more noise and overall IQ looks worse.

    this is the price you pay for smaller sensors & smaller lenses (even p&s cams are smaller than they used to be) and more MPs.
     
  9. JerryPH

    JerryPH No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    6,111
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Montreal, QC, Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I personally don't think that true. I gave my mother my old 3.2MP Kodak and look at her pics and mine side by side of the samce scene. Honestly, no comparison. Now... looking back at pics of my old Kodak 1MP vs the 3.2MP, well, in my cases technology definately moved forward and pics improved visibly. If I throw the Nikon E8800 into the fray (its not really a P&S), it is even better. I am happily now doing things with my D200 that I have never done before. Kinda ironic, though, but I am also now SO MUCH MORE critical of my pictures than I ever was. In the olden days, I was happy that I could make out what I took a pic of... now I pixel peep, post process and in general do a lot more than before to get the same level of satisfaction... but thats not the camera's fault, just mine as I grow in this hobby.

    I don't see the trend you are, but I did look at your pics, and I basically think you are comparing apples and oranges. A newer poorer quality camera against an older better one, nothing more than that. Not all newer cameras are better... but the vast majority definately are.
     
  10. pm63

    pm63 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    London
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Yeah, this makes your point. That TZ3 is TERRIBLE, an absolute disgrace, I don't blame you for return. The old Fuji is indeed the best by a long way. I love the old school Dorito packaging on that old pic! :)

    JerryPH might be right though. Personally I don't know enough to comment on this.
     
  11. cupax

    cupax TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I spoke with a digital photography expert and he pointed me to one model - Fujifilm F30/F31fd. Looking at the test photos I can say that it is just incredible and beats any more expensive camera in the compact class. The secret? An ultra sensitive chip (iso3200) instead of more pixels. Judge by yourself - check out the blue skies in the sample photos at 100%: no trace of noise at all:
    http://www.steves-digicams.com/2006_reviews/fuji_f30_samples.html

    And yes, is again a Fuji and it has (only) 6MP. Too bad is out of production.
     
  12. gryphonslair99

    gryphonslair99 Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    11,443
    Likes Received:
    2,100
    Location:
    Wichita, Kansas, USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit

    I can take the same three cameras that you have and get the exact opposite results. You ARE NOT shooting the same thing with the same settings. Per the Exif data the TZ3 was shoot with an ISO of 400. The S5100 was shot at an ISO of 200 and the 2600 was shot at an ISO of 100.

    That is like having a race between a KIA and a Corvette and removing 4 of the Corvettes spark plugs. Try setting the cameras to the exact same settings and try your test again. Point and Shoot cameras are known for having poor high ISO performance.

    All three cameras were set up differently from the factory as well. P&S cameras shooting .jpgs are set to do in camera processing. This is something you can change in the camera to your liking. Once you have everything on as level a playing field as possible then you can do a true test comparison.

    Good luck.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
are new digital cameras with smaller pixels better than older cameras with larger pixels
,
are old cameras better than new
,

are old cameras better than new ones

,
are older digital cameras better than newer ones
,
compare old and new cameras
,
comparison between old and new cameras
,
how are new digital cameras better than older ones
,
is an older digital camera better than the new ones
,
newer cameras really that much better than older ones
,
why digital cameras better or worse than old cameras