Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S DX VR Autofocus Lens

Discussion in 'Beyond the Basics' started by Nix725, May 1, 2009.

  1. Nix725

    Nix725 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    West Palm Beach FL
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I am looking for a lens that I do not need to change out if I want to do portrait shot then switch to landscape shots in a matter of minutes. I travel a lot and have been researching lenses and I have came across this one. I was just curious if anyone else has used this lens and their experience with it.
     
  2. BTilson

    BTilson TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Western NC, USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    From what I have heard, this is the best of the "superzoom" lenses. I don't have any direct experience with them, but I do think they lack "something" in image quality, so you may also want to take that into consideration. Again though, this is allegedly the best of the best in this class of lenses. Hope that helps some.
     
  3. Nix725

    Nix725 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    West Palm Beach FL
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Thanks; I was also looking at the 60mm 2.8 Nikkor lens, but then someone told me to check out the 18-200. I do a lot of portraits, but I am also starting to get into landscapes and shots that require zoom.
     
  4. JerryPH

    JerryPH No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    6,111
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Montreal, QC, Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Try doing a search, you will find several good threads with this lens discussed in tons of detail.
     
  5. bdavis

    bdavis TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    784
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Iowa
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    This weekend I actually shot some portraits with a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8

    Something like this could meet your needs as well. It can go wider than the Nikon, but would get better image quality and a faster aperture than that superzoom. And, when I wanted to take a portrait, I zoomed right in to 50mm...problem solved.

    Also you might want to consider something like an 18-70 or maybe a 24-70 too. I guess I'm just not a fan of huge zooms like 18-200, I know they are convenient, but I feel image quality suffers. I would rather change lenses and get good shots then be lazy and use the same one because of its zoom range.
     
  6. Nix725

    Nix725 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    West Palm Beach FL
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Well put, I do love sharpness. How is the Tamron in that aspect?
     
  7. JerryPH

    JerryPH No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    6,111
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Montreal, QC, Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    First, a little dose of reality for the OP... no less does everything perfectly. The wider the range, the lower the quality. That said, of all the superzooms on the market, *NONE* are better than the Nikon 18-200... but it is not what I would call a high quality lens... it is just a very good all-round lens.

    The Sigma 18-50 DC EX HSM macro F/2.8 is a known better lens... at least that is what the results of 3 indepenant photography magazines said last year. It is also within 5 dollars of the same price of a Sigma if you look. It also has a free macro mode that the Tamron doesn't have. The Sigma not only beat the Tamron, but the $1500 Nikkor 17-55 in several areas of the shoot-out. That says a lot about the Sigma.

    1 - 1mm width increase is nothing special, it will be near invisible to see in the real world. :)

    2 - True... but above 50mm the Nikon will have the better quality picture. Between 50-150mm it is as sharp as the near $2000 Nikkor 70-200 lens at apertures between F/10-F/13. That says a LOT, over and above the fact that the Sigma ends at 50 and the Nikon has an extra 150mm or focal range left over. That is near 3 times greater focal range! As for better image quality, the Nikon's best compared to the Tamron's best... I would be willing to bet that this is a wash. Each lens is "best" at so totally different things that this is impossible to say with any great credibility.

    3 - True. The 18-200 is a slower lens but then again, it has VR, the Tamron doesn't.

    4 - We all know that the best portrait lenses on the market are way above 50mm. At 50mm we still have a ton of distortion that I like to call chipmunk cheek. This starts to dissipate around 70mm and is near invisible at 100mm and up. That is why the better portrait lenses are in the 100-200mm range... they compress the scene and enhance rather than distort.

    When someone tells me they want pro level landscapes and portraits, I point to 2 lenses, not one... but if the person shows me a strong desire to NOT change lenses and want the ability to do both, then I point to the 18-200... *IF* they understand the limitations of that lens and are willing to accept these limitations. ;) :D
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2009
  8. Garbz

    Garbz No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    203
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Just a few notes:

    1. For portraits you want low apertures, which the 18-200 doesn't offer.
    2. For Landscapes you want sharp pictures and low distortion, which the 18-200 definitely doesn't offer. (shooting at 18mm is like looking through a fishbowl).

    The 18-200 is a convenient lens. It offers a heck of a lot in a single lens and is great for any vacation, but the question is that aside from the two points above does the convenience outweigh the following:

    - The least sharp solution
    - Vignetting is bad at the low end of the zoom range
    - Distortions are definitely field relevant and correcting in photoshop drops your field of view to 24-28mm on the wide side.
    - The construction is nasty and the lens is nasty to use. Zooming especially the lens flows too freely through the 30-130mm range and then needs to be forced to the 200mm point.
    - The lens creeps. This may sound like something minor but it is a major nuisance if you are used to lenses which don't. Makes you not want to shoot anything that's not right in front of you.
    - The front element extends more than 10cm from the camera and wobbles.
    - Because of this extension I would not want to ever drop or bump this lens against anything. It would snap in half. And because of the creep you'll find the lens is always at 200mm when the camera is dangling around your neck.

    Is that worth the inconvenience of spending 15 seconds changing lenses to you? If so get it and you'll love it. If not don't bother.
     
  9. Nix725

    Nix725 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    West Palm Beach FL
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    After more read and advice from Jerry, I have decided to go with a Sigma 10-20mm and a Sigma 105mm + Macro. The only downside to the 105mm is the AF does not work on the D60.
     
  10. newbe

    newbe TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    I own that 18-200 in nikon mount. I have th D-300 It is a great lens for what you want. I bought it for the same purpose. I travel and wanted one lens that would do what I needed. When I do shoot landscapes the lens is not quite wide enough, it is actually a 28 in digital cameras. I went and bought Tamron 10-24. But you will be happy with your lens. It is sharp and fun!!
     
  11. dcclark

    dcclark TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    480
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Houghton, MI
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I feel like I should offer some contrasting views here, because I own the Nikon 18-200 VR, and have apparently had quite different experiences with it than Garbz:

    There is barrel distortion at the wide end, but nowhere near this bad. There are lenses with less, but also plenty of lenses with more. I would generally not worry much about the amount of distortion present here, unless you're shooting lots of geometric subjects.


    I have only ever seen this problem with filters -- which is a problem on almost any lens. At 18mm "naked", stopped down even slightly, there are no problems.

    This one really surprised me. Maybe you got a bad sample, but the construction is just fine. Yes, much of it is plastic, but it's solid and well-built. The front segment does NOT wiggle or jerk. The zoom range is very well cammed -- the middle is certainly faster, but getting to 200 is no problem at all. Perhaps you're noticing that it's a very nonlinear scale, which is actually ideal.

    True that it creeps at some points (moreso at longer focal distances, but there is no creep at all at 18mm -- a fine place to leave it, too), but every zoom lens creeps, period. I use this lens constantly and have never found it to inhibit my shooting in any way.

    I have also "drop tested" and definitely "thwap tested" it out in the woods, against trees and branches. No problems at all (although I don't condone lens abuse... :p)

    I chose the Nikon 18-200 for convenience, and the ability to use it and NOT change lenses is extremely valuable to me -- because I typically use it miles away from the nearest road, much less my camera bag (I have better things to put in my pack than a bunch of delicate lenses). However, this may not describe you. In that case, you should of course make your own choice. However, the facts above are still important to consider.
     
  12. lschaaf

    lschaaf TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Glendale, AZ
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I have both the 18-200mm Nikon and the 60mm f2.8 and love both of them! I find changing lens a pain, though I do it if I have to. But I love just grabbing the camera with my all purpose lens. However, the variable aperture has been an issue in early evening family portrait shots. I upped my ISO, but found I preferred the 60mm f2.8 shots, then cropped closer (I used both because I wasn't sure which I would like better.) The 70-200 f2.8 is my dream lens, but I'll have to wait for that. I only bring my 18-200 when traveling. Oh, and it is tossed over my shoulder w/the lens attached, it does zoom out but hasn't been a problem for me yet! (I'm knocking on wood as I type). I try to pay attention to how it's swinging!
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
nikon 18-200 wobble
,

nikon 18-200mm

,

nikon 18-200mm f/3.5

,
nikon 18-200mm wide angle attachment
,
nikon 18-70 wobble
,

tamron 18-200 distortion

,

tamron 18-200 pictures

,
tamron 18-270 barrel distortion
,
tamron 18-270 or nikkor 18-200 vr?
,

tamron 18-270 with wide angle