I just rented a 300 f2.8, non-VR, and absolutely loved the lens. Shot some of my son's High School baseball and got some amazing captures. However, I will also be shooting football under really bad lighting so I was wondering if the 200 f2 with a tele, I have the 1.7, would be a more versatile option. Just looking for some feedback and opinions. Shooting with a D3s. Thanks for the help.