Im looking at buying my first dslr in about a month once i get the cash together. Im only 17, and a senior in high school. Im looking to do alot of very fast moving sports photography (specifically mountain biking, and some school sports for the school newspaper). I know both of these cameras are perfectly capable of this. Im definitley sticking with nikon as i just dont like the way canons feel in my hand. Im wondering if im better off getting the d3000 with the 18-55 and 55-200 vr lenses, or the d5000 with just the 18-55vr. They come out close to the same price. Is it worth not getting a second lens to gain 2 more mp, hd video, the vari angle screen, and 4 fps instead of 3? Am i going to miss the second lens that much?