Nikon VS NIKON VS TAMRON

Discussion in 'Digital Discussion & Q&A' started by Lunchbox, Apr 30, 2009.

  1. Lunchbox
    Offline

    Lunchbox New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    338
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    NC
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I need a Real lense. Options

    nikon 80-200 2.8

    Nikon 70-200 2.8

    Tamron 70-200 2.8

    obviously i would choose the nikon 70-200 2.8VR but its more than double the price


    I was wondering what peoples thoughts and if you have any sample photos with these lenses.

    Mostly what i would be using it for will be automotive photography (track, dragstrip, other)

    is the VR really worth paying double?

    show me some pics if you can and what camera your using also....thanks
  2. ann
    Online

    ann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2007
    Messages:
    4,263
    Likes Received:
    189
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +189 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    why not go to a local camera store, and take your camera, or at least your own compact fash card and test these lens.
    take the same image at each major focal length and at each full stop. then go home and look at them on your monitor, you will have your answer.

    For myself, i find the VR function at nice feature, especially with the type of work you will be doing. (I do own the 70-200 2.8 vr nikor lens and i have the 80-200 2.8 as well.) It is my personal decision not to own a third party lens. I am sure you will find many others who disagree with me, which is fine. That is why i suggest you test for yourself, then make a choice based on what you see first hand.
  3. Garbz
    Offline

    Garbz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,712
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +202 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    VR has benefits for panning shots since it would give you vertical VR but ignore horrizontal movement, but really I don't think it's anywhere near worth double the price, and with minimal effort you can get great panning shots without it.

    Other than that the Nikkor 70-200 brings nothing more to the table. The 80-200 can easily track a fast car coming towards you, providing it's on a capable camera. The focus speed depends exclusively on the camera body it's attached to and the lens is very well geared.
  4. jdwyer
    Offline

    jdwyer New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Pinacolodaburg
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    First time posting images here - lets hope it works. Took these with a D60 and the Tamron 70-200. I also have the 2x converter for it which doubles the effective range, only the last image used the 2x converter. no PP on any of these photos
    1.
    [​IMG]

    2.
    [​IMG]

    3.
    [​IMG]

    4. This one I did use the 2x converter for - kinda happy with it.
    [​IMG]
  5. jdwyer
    Offline

    jdwyer New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Pinacolodaburg
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    cool man posting photos worked. yea, the tamron 70-200 is a great lens. it focuses a little loud (but who really cares) and the manual focus ring has a tendency not to engage. usually requires a second try a little harder.
  6. bdavis
    Offline

    bdavis New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    784
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Iowa
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I would vote for the 80-200 2.8....good piece of glass.
  7. benhasajeep
    Offline

    benhasajeep New Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    2,101
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Eddington, ME
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0
    The nikon 80-200 f/2.8D is a rock solid lens. If you look for used make sure its a twist zoom and not older push pull. The twist zoom is faster focusing than the older push pull.

    The 80-200D is really close in price to the third party lens makers. It's a great buy. As for the VR and being worth it. Just look at some of the older copies of car / bike racing mags and books. They got those pictures without VR. Just takes practice. I am big on buying good glass but I still only have 1 VR lens and that was a kit lens that came with the D40X I bought for travel. All my other Nikon lenses are F/2.8D's including an 80-200 that is about 8 years old and going strong, no issues with it ever!
  8. bhop
    Offline

    bhop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,158
    Likes Received:
    213
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +213 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    I would avoid the Tamron for automotive sports. Everything i've read about it says that it's super sharp, but the focus speed is slow, although I haven't tried it personally. That was a dealbreaker for me for shooting fast moving cars. I couldn't afford the Nikons, (80-200 is cheap but without the AF-S) so I bought the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 HSM and use it for motorsports. Works great. Focus is fast and it's sharp. Sure it's not as sharp as the nikons but it's literally half the price of the 70-200 for example, and I am extremely happy with it.

    some shots with it
    Flickr: Search bhop's photostream
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2009
  9. djacobox372
    Offline

    djacobox372 New Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,926
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +129 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Like everybody has said, tamron zooms take excellent photos, but their focus is loud and slow.

    BUT, if you don't care about focus speed then you may consider saving even more $$ and buying an older, used tamron 70-210mm f2.8; those sell used for about $350 and are fantastic lenses EXCEPT for focus speed.
  10. ANDS!
    Offline

    ANDS! New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,179
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Downtown
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Slows probably relative. To me, the 80-200 AF-D is "slow".
  11. Lunchbox
    Offline

    Lunchbox New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    338
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    NC
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    i just wish i could get my hands on a 80-200 to compare...noone around here has one....I have seen one in the past year and it sold in 2hours...lol
  12. bhop
    Offline

    bhop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,158
    Likes Received:
    213
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +213 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Well, the AF-S version should be comparable to other AF-S lenses, which would be good, if not great, but the AF-D.. that'd depend on the AF torque of the camera you're using it on. For example, my Sigma 70-300 lens (no internal motor) is annoyingly slow on my D70, slightly better on my D200, but useably fast on my F100.
  13. Lunchbox
    Offline

    Lunchbox New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    338
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    NC
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    i am shooting a d200
  14. Garbz
    Offline

    Garbz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,712
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +202 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    The Nikkor 80-200 is sufficiently fast on a D200. I say sufficiently because a lot of people complain that it's "slow" and lets face it, it has no silentwave motor in it. That said it had no issue tracking a Yamaha R1 coming down towards me on a straight. It also had no issue tracking a football game. So the question is what does define too slow?
  15. benhasajeep
    Offline

    benhasajeep New Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    2,101
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Eddington, ME
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0
    Well I think there is some confusion in which 80-200 people are refferring to sometimes. As the older push pull version was offered as an 80-200 af-D model. Then in late 90's Nikon changed the design to twist zoom lens with a faster acting focusing system (gearing). This was also listed as a 80-200 af-D. So even though they are 2 different lenses they had the same identification. The later lens, still in production was a bit faster than the original version.

Share This Page