Discussion in 'Critique Forum Archives' started by RMThompson, May 24, 2007.
Made from a single JPG:
Does it work? Too much?
Which do you like better, the one above or:
I LOVE BOTH!!!!!!!! Perfect IMO
I like the lower one more.
Now. tell me how you did it.
The only difference is in colour temperature, isn't it?
That is what I see, and when I finally detected the difference, I started to feel like I prefer the second photo to the first, not so warm.
Though ... :scratch: ... come to think of it, I am not so fond of the amount of green in the two lower corners, plus the first has a little more detail where the people are. Tough choice.
I took one jpg of a sunset, and I split it into 3 pictures. One exposed properly, one too dark and one too blown out. Then I added them into Photomatix as if it was 3 seperate photos, it added what it assumed was the difference in exposure, and after some tone mapping, voila!
I thought that is essentially what an HDR image is? Except for people typically use 5 - 7 exposures for a typical HDR.
I prefer the top image.. It's obviously over saturated, but it works well for the picture and I like it..
I don't get how it's non-HDR. photomatrix is HDR... right?
Well the difference here is I used the SAME jpg, sort of a no-no among HDR enthusiasts. You use 3 - 7 JPGS or a single RAW file at the very least.
The idea in HDR is to capture a range not normally available in one exposure, but you can see here that in reality, this is a normal exposed range, but by combining the photos, we get a deepr contrast from black to pure white, and saturated colors!
hmmm.... i might try that later! what did you do, adjust levels and then submit the three at the different adjusted exposures?
Yep. I used Picasa 2 actually, because of the convienent "shadow" and "FIll Light" functions, kept one normal, added about 60 % in another and 60% fill light in a third, saved them seperate and opened them in Photomatix.
There I combined them, and adjust the output's levels, keeping saturation high, and used an 8bit output.
I am POSITIVE someone could do this with Photoshop without combining photos, levels and what not, but I find this to be easier, albeit a little unpredictable!
neat! ok now i'm excited. i have so many photos that would just look BETTER with HDR.
Separate names with a comma.