{NSFW} Kate & Jen play cops & robbers (handcuffs, nudity)

PatrickHMS · Oct 25, 2009

I agree with most all of the comments above. Not appealing or at all sexy.

but -

STRIP SEARCH !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Moonb007 · Oct 26, 2009

I don't think they are all that bad, but I was not wowed when it came to imagery.

gian133 · Oct 27, 2009

i agree with everyone stating its more of a porn picture than an artistic one.
but aside from that, i feel if you were going for art that it would be much better if they wern't looking at the camera. if they were more like caught in action.

gopal · Oct 28, 2009

i think cops robbed her of her dress and why then handcuffed...
great idea...congrats.

CCarsonPhoto · Oct 28, 2009

Eh. Nothing in or about that photo appeals to me.

SrBiscuit · Oct 30, 2009

i always think its so funny when people look at a nude on this site and get all worked up. google "boobs" if that's what you wanna see.

i agree with the crits. poor expressions. odd orange splotches.
it's just not too dynamic.
sry.

TheCoolerKing · Nov 1, 2009

AverageJoe said:
Just my opinion:
I don't think this type of photo fits in well with the rest of thephotoforum. I think it is tasteless even for this type of photography. What was your objective for this shoot?

I agree.
We have a term "Man with Camera" (MWC).

It pretty much means someone using the excuse of having a camera for women to get nude for him.

Thats how I feel with this shoot.

cumi · Nov 6, 2009

I saw recently some photos forseen for auctions (Dorotheum in Vienna/Autria) from some known photographers. There were some -really- pornographic (oral sexual activities -to use diplomatic language-, lot of nudity, even few discusting ones) among them. Pornographic, but (probably) somehow art photos. And the photos looked somehow good...

The point is, that it doesn't matters a lot, WHAT FROM do you take a photo, but HOW the photo is taken. I think, this photo could be improved, if it would be -photographically- more special (different posing, face expressions...).

I'm not an expert, but, I don't think this photo doesn't belongs here. Why not some konstructive C&C deserved?

Rifleman1776 · Nov 6, 2009

Girls are pretty.
Technically, photo OK, even good.
Art? Not even close.

JamesMason · Nov 6, 2009

Girl on bottom needs a meal. Pay her mcdonalds coupons

NateWagner · Nov 6, 2009

JamesMason said:
Girl on bottom needs a meal. Pay her mcdonalds coupons

Why do you think it's ok to make comments like that...

It's akin to saying,

That girl needs to skip a few meals, pay her with coupons for slimfast.

JamesMason · Nov 6, 2009

NateWagner said:
JamesMason said:

Girl on bottom needs a meal. Pay her mcdonalds coupons

Click to expand...

Why do you think it's ok to make comments like that...

It's akin to saying,

That girl needs to skip a few meals, pay her with coupons for slimfast.

sorry probs was a little out of line. The fashion/glamour world just annoys me sometimes

RMThompson · Nov 6, 2009

TheCoolerKing said:
AverageJoe said:

Just my opinion:
I don't think this type of photo fits in well with the rest of thephotoforum. I think it is tasteless even for this type of photography. What was your objective for this shoot?

Click to expand...

I agree.
We have a term "Man with Camera" (MWC).

It pretty much means someone using the excuse of having a camera for women to get nude for him.

Thats how I feel with this shoot.