SuzukiGS750EZ
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2016
- Messages
- 728
- Reaction score
- 145
- Location
- Connecticut
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I bought a Canon Digital Rebel XTi about 10 years ago and lost interest in the camera some years later. I just felt like i outgrew the camera and at the time i couldn't afford it. I ended up using the excuse "it was too big to bring out" and well, you can image the rest. I got an Olympus TG-820 iHS and carried that since it took decent photos. I had some lenses, accessories, was used to the menu's, etc. So i went along and purchased my Canon 80D from the camera shop my uncle has worked at for FOREVER in NJ and living in CT i ended up with instant gratification, i got it the next day. It wasn't an impulse buy as i have been looking at a camera for quite some time and it was in my budget so that's why i went with it. Days into owning it i was snooping around on the internet and found out that the Nikon D7200 is the competitor to the 80D. My uncle is a nikon guy so i have been able to play with them and owned one at one point, a Coolpix 5400. Anyways, everyone says the nikon produces sharper images and is better in low light. I know the canon is no slouch, but did i shoot myself in the foot money wise when i could have taken the money i spent on the 80D and bought the D7200? Are the differences in sharpness and low light performance negligible? Besides for video (which i don't do much of) what does the canon have over the nikon? Not that i can go back and return it, nor do i want to sell it (just bought a battery grip for it which i have always wanted), just wondering why canon answered the d7200 with this if it's not "as good". I know i'm asking in a canon forum so i suspect i'll get defensive answers of some sort, but in a good way. Thanks!