epp_b
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2008
- Messages
- 2,135
- Reaction score
- 12
- Location
- True North Cold and Freezing
- Website
- www.eppbphoto.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
OK, I've been through a roll of film now (Oooooo! Yeah, I know, a whole roll, big deal...) and I think I've found the definition for "digitographer".
If you use a digital camera, this does not necessarily make you a digitographer. Conversely, If you use film, this does not necessarily make you a photographer. If you take photos and know they are good because you know that they are well composed and properly metered for, you're probably a photographer. If you take pictures and hope they are good because you didn't bother thinking about composition or metering, you might be a "digitographer".
I fear I may have started as a digitographer, but I'm working my way to being able to know whether a photo is good without having to look at the LCD.
Yesterday, I went for a walk around town and took only 11 pictures. I considered 7 of them to be worth showing, which is a much better "keeper rate" then I've had most of the time.
Thoughts?
If you use a digital camera, this does not necessarily make you a digitographer. Conversely, If you use film, this does not necessarily make you a photographer. If you take photos and know they are good because you know that they are well composed and properly metered for, you're probably a photographer. If you take pictures and hope they are good because you didn't bother thinking about composition or metering, you might be a "digitographer".
I fear I may have started as a digitographer, but I'm working my way to being able to know whether a photo is good without having to look at the LCD.
Yesterday, I went for a walk around town and took only 11 pictures. I considered 7 of them to be worth showing, which is a much better "keeper rate" then I've had most of the time.
Thoughts?