Discussion in 'Critique Forum Archives' started by elsaspet, Sep 21, 2005.
Haven't voted yet but I'd go for either 2 or 4.
I would suggest #4 or #2 for your choice but believe you could do better.
I have a limited number of images at the moment to work with. Hopefully, I will grow in wedding photography. Like I said before, these are strickly PJ style shots, and are not for everyone. A lot of people like Classic posing for the camera type stuff, but that isn't really the style I'm interested in. In fact I would feel pretty bored with that type of thing.
To give you a general idea of the type of website I'm going for, look here:
As for the type of photography style I am going for, look here:
And finally, to give further insite to a more well rounded look at how I view my own personal wedding photography, look here:
My vision is to give this a very definate photojournalistic bent. I'm trying to do with wedding photography what I do with my agency submissions. I'm looking for something fairly unique. Perhaps I am my own worst editor though, and these are not the best images to size up my intentions. But the "feel" is there in my examples. Does that make any sense?
Hopefully that will help clarify things.
As always, thank you for your suggestions!
i want to vote for 4 but there's no check box for it
oh there is now!
I voted for #4.
number 2 just looks fake to me...almost like a porcelain doll
and i think the cover of a wedding portfolio should have both the bride and groom
Separate names with a comma.