PP-Skin Smoothing. Too Much? (maybe NSFW!)

WDodd

TPF Noob!
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
901
Reaction score
1
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
Too much skin smoothing? I was showing a friend my pictures and they said I needed more but I dunno if I like it.

 
Is the patchy light on her body and legs edited? I think the rest looks fine, could have done with a bit better lighting tho
 
Is the patchy light on her body and legs edited? I think the rest looks fine, could have done with a bit better lighting tho

I didn't do any editing but some skin smoothing. Lighting is all natural, it was mid-day and we were under a tree. The bright spots filtered through. I used a reflected to try and take them out but that was the best I managed.

jemmy said:
a bit too much editing on the face for me... but, heck.. i'd kill for that body! x

Thanks for the comment she will be happy to hear that! :wink:
 
Stupid question....how do you do the skin smoothing?
 
I don't think it's too much at all. It's probably a lot less than a typical pro model shoot.

Stupid question....how do you do the skin smoothing?
There are many techniques and methods...just Google 'Photoshop + skin' and you will have a month's worth of reading.
 
Stupid question....how do you do the skin smoothing?

Not a stupid question at all.

There are lots of technique.
The simplest one that doesn't destroy pixels (assuming use of PS) is to:
  1. make a duplicate layer.
  2. take out all sizeable zits, blemishes with spot-healing tool
  3. blur that layer with a Gaussian blur until all the surface blem disappear
  4. make a layer mask that reveals all (white)
  5. paint on mask with black brush wherever you want detail to show through from detailed layer below
  6. adjust opacity of duplicate layer until you get the look you want.
 
That's similar to what I do...only I do it in reverse. I make a separate layer and use Gaussian blur...but I make the layer mask to hide all and then paint in the area that I want to smooth.
 
That's similar to what I do...only I do it in reverse. I make a separate layer and use Gaussian blur...but I make the layer mask to hide all and then paint in the area that I want to smooth.

I'm sorry that's absolutely wrong.
This thread is closed.
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Big Mike said:
I don't think it's too much at all. It's probably a lot less than a typical pro model shoot.

I was going for magazine type smoothing I guess. Although I don't really like that much myself.

The_Traveler said:
Not a stupid question at all.
There are lots of technique.
The simplest one that doesn't destroy pixels (assuming use of PS) is to:
  1. make a duplicate layer.
  2. take out all sizeable zits, blemishes with spot-healing tool
  3. blur that layer with a Gaussian blur until all the surface blem disappear
  4. make a layer mask that reveals all (white)
  5. paint on mask with black brush wherever you want detail to show through from detailed layer below
  6. adjust opacity of duplicate layer until you get the look you want.
Actually pretty close exactly to what I do. I use the heal brush before I make a duplicate layer first, and I make a layer mask that hides all.

Here is a step-by-step tutorial that taught me my method: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=171753&highlight=airbrushing
 
All of the pros I've seen speak on the topic insist that blur is NOT the correct tool, especially not gaussian blur. They all insist that most of the smoothing should be done with the healing brush, clone tool, and various sharpening and blending layers. There's no reason that smooth has to be soft.
 
Heres a method I use, its somewhat the same as the last link posted but instead of using a solid white and black mask which blurs everthing the same strength, it is brushed on, has a lot more control because its built up gradually. On my tutorial I didn't use the high pass layer because of the lighting, if used with good lighting it can create some really great effects. Great link though, i'll have to try the dust and scratches filter.

I wrote a mini tutorial on someone elses post here:
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=86189
 
I agree with MaxBloom to the extent that too many reley on blur when other methods do such a more professional look. Having said that, there are obviously situations that blur works very well.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top